Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 11/25/03
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: doubts about rc4"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: sci.crypt sandbox"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
"Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:71p6svokrgkto1h50ckmoqq1i8mvltlj91@4ax.com...
> Bill Unruh writes:
>
[snip]
>
> The same can be said for time travel.
>
Time travel brakes the laws of the conservation of energy
and momentum. A moving chunk of mass/energy disappears
from the present and appears in the past of future. If the
item goes into the past the same matter appears twice.
Andrew Swallow
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: doubts about rc4"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: sci.crypt sandbox"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|