Re: Irrational numbers
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 11/04/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:21:18 +0100
Gregory G Rose wrote:
>
> In article <3FA7D76A.5C27018F@t-online.de>,
> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
> >Don't know what you mean. Percival's posts gave the
> >impression that he knows very well of the algorithms
> >he mentioned. So he must have materials and references
> >readily at his hand. I requested him to give some good
> >references of good implementations or slse sketches that
> >help to do implementations. Sofar he hasn't answered.
> >So what's the point of yours above? Could you explain?
>
> I hate M-K when he's in this mode. I'll point out
> that Colin Percival *did* give a reference, that
> M-K seems to have ignored, because he doesn't
> actually bother to understand what he's reading,
> and just argues. *I* found the reference helpful.
> M-K replied to the message (so can't deny seeing
> it) and just reiterated his request. Rissole.
He only gave the names of two algorithms, nothing more.
I asked him to give references to implementations
of the algorithms so that I could actually try out
my example straightaway or else sketches of designs so
that I could attempt to do the implementation myself.
Is that clear to you?
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Irrational numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|