sci.crypt
By Date

3092 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

---

Starting: 09/30/03
Ending: 10/31/03

• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/31/03)
• Re: counter mode and data integrity Andrew Swallow (10/31/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC John Hairell (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic G. Orme (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic Rob Warnock (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic G. Orme (10/31/03)
• Re: Factoring Integers "near" a power Colin Andrew Percival (10/31/03)
• Re: counter mode and data integrity Joerg Platte (10/31/03)
• Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Phil Carmody (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic ink (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic joss (10/31/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... puzzolino (10/31/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Marco Era (10/31/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Tom St Denis (10/31/03)
• Re: counter mode and data integrity Michael Amling (10/31/03)
• Re: counter mode and data integrity flip (10/31/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/31/03)
• Re: One-Time_Pad Michael Amling (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic ink (10/31/03)
• Re: Basic Crypto info wanted kurt wismer (10/31/03)
• I apologize for my previous post... Stephen Cantini (10/31/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Jim Gillogly (10/31/03)
• Re: Johnny Mnemonic Tanu R. (10/31/03)
• Johnny Mnemonic G. Orme (10/31/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
• Re: Basic Crypto info wanted Andreas D. Landmark (10/31/03)
• Re: counter mode and data integrity Joerg Platte (10/31/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Marco Era (10/31/03)
• Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Stefan Seiffarth (10/31/03)
• Re: counter mode and data integrity John E. Hadstate (10/31/03)
• Re: Provable security against differential cryptanalysis Foo Bar (10/31/03)
• Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
• counter mode and data integrity Joerg Platte (10/31/03)
• How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Hyper4S (10/31/03)
• Re: Basic Crypto info wanted Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/31/03)
• Re: Basic Crypto info wanted flip (10/31/03)
• Re: One-Time_Pad Alan Connor (10/31/03)
• Re: One-Time_Pad MacGregor K. Phillips (10/31/03)
• Basic Crypto info wanted Kevin (10/31/03)
• Re: Newbie: Password based encrypting using cryptlib Ajay (10/31/03)
• Re: Newbie: Password based encrypting using cryptlib dAve (10/31/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC David Magda (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC David Magda (10/30/03)
• Re: One-Time_Pad Alan Connor (10/30/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
• Newbie: Password based encrypting using cryptlib Ajay (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC John Hairell (10/30/03)
• Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Andrew Swallow (10/30/03)
• Re: ARC4 Anton Stiglic (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
• Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
• One-Time_Pad Neko (10/30/03)
• Re: Provable security against differential cryptanalysis Tom St Denis (10/30/03)
• Provable security against differential cryptanalysis Benjamin Choi (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/30/03)
• What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... puzzolino (10/30/03)
• ARC4 Konstantin Larionov (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Bill Unruh (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography John E. Hadstate (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
• Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (10/30/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Roger Schlafly (10/30/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/30/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/30/03)
• Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Le Chaud Lapin (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Jeff (10/30/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Andrew Swallow (10/30/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Anton Stiglic (10/30/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
• Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Jan Panteltje (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• NIZK with deterministic prover Gelo Ilzi (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Ulrich Wurst (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC JohnTromaville (10/29/03)
• (URL) A new PRNG of Marsaglia Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC JohnTromaville (10/29/03)
• Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: substitution cipher CBC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Phil Carmody (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Anton Stiglic (10/29/03)
• Re: First Commercial Optical Processor dsr_at_Florence.edu (10/29/03)
• Re: Another Thawte Challenge... Jubilation T. Cornpone, CSA (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography John Hadstate (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Gregory G Rose (10/29/03)
• First Commercial Optical Processor cesar bremer (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/29/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Louis Granboulan (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Grumble (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Bill Unruh (10/29/03)
• Another Thawte Challenge... Mike Curry (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC David A. Scott (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Mailman (10/29/03)
• substitution cipher CBC Michael Scott (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Verfication of security protocol Ulf Reiman (10/29/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Colin Andrew Percival (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Bill Unruh (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/29/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Tom St Denis (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Richard Herring (10/29/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Jyrki Lahtonen (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/29/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Benjamin Choi (10/29/03)
• Re: need advice Tanu R. (10/29/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost John A. Malley (10/29/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Michael Amling (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Victor S. Miller (10/29/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost robertocarlos (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Scott Contini (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/29/03)
• Re: Have you seen this before??? nemo outis (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Greg Doyle (10/29/03)
• Vigenere++ Proposal of a (new?) cipher Stephen Cantini (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Paul Crowley (10/29/03)
• Re: manual cryptography Simon Johnson (10/29/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Gerry Myerson (10/29/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC David A. Scott (10/29/03)
• Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Bill Unruh (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Bill Unruh (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: Naive encryption schemes Bill Unruh (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/28/03)
• Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Gelo Ilzi (10/28/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/28/03)
• Re: Generators of cyclic group John Savard (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC JohnTromaville (10/28/03)
• Generators of cyclic group Robin Lavall?e (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/28/03)
• Re: Naive encryption schemes John Savard (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Tom St Denis (10/28/03)
• Re: need advice James L. Dean (10/28/03)
• manual cryptography Neko (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/28/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Michael Amling (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
• Re: Naive encryption schemes Kev (10/28/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost cesar bremer (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Grumble (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Bob Silverman (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost cesar bremer (10/28/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Richard Herring (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: Have you seen this before??? Michael Amling (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/28/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/28/03)
• Re: need advice Simon Johnson (10/28/03)
• Re: Have you seen this before??? Richard Heathfield (10/28/03)
• Re: Have you seen this before??? Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
• Have you seen this before??? InMemoriam (10/28/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Richard Heathfield (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/28/03)
• Re: need advice Tanu R. (10/28/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Bryan Olson (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/28/03)
• Re: How weak is this idea? JohnTromaville (10/28/03)
• Re: xor without known key kurt wismer (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/28/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" r.e.s. (10/28/03)
• Re: How weak is this idea? Gregory G Rose (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
• Re: How weak is this idea? Mike Curry (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Gregory G Rose (10/28/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Scott Contini (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Scott Contini (10/28/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Phil Carmody (10/28/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/28/03)
• Re: need advice David A. Scott (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC DJohn37050 (10/27/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Jim Gillogly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Jan Panteltje (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC David A. Scott (10/27/03)
• Re: Naive encryption schemes Gregory G Rose (10/27/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Anton Spaans (10/27/03)
• Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Sean (10/27/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Joe Peschel (10/27/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• How weak is this idea? JohnTromaville (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: need advice James L. Dean (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: need advice James L. Dean (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Ulrich Wurst (10/27/03)
• Naive encryption schemes Chuck Rittersdorf (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Anton Stiglic (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Gregory G Rose (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Anton Stiglic (10/27/03)
• need advice Neko (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Jim Ford (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Robert Harley (10/27/03)
• Re: Factoring Integers "near" a power Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
• Re: Factoring Integers "near" a power Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Factoring Integers "near" a power Stush (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/27/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Michael Amling (10/27/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost Michael Amling (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Kristian Gjøsteen (10/27/03)
• Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andrew Swallow (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Bill Unruh (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andy Robinson (10/27/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: Good-Turing Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
• Re: actual captured encrypted messages Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
• Re: xor without known key Joe Peschel (10/27/03)
• Re: Using 10101010 as padding. Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Lassi Hippeläinen  (10/27/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis cost David Wagner (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• cryptanalysis cost robertocarlos (10/27/03)
• Re: software implementation of DES flip (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• software implementation of DES xam (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Alan Connor (10/27/03)
• Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Francois Grieu (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Alan Connor (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Scott Contini (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Alan Connor (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC DJohn37050 (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC John Savard (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Andrew Swallow (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC newstome_at_comcast.net (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
• Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andrew Swallow (10/27/03)
• Re: NSA chooses ECC DJohn37050 (10/27/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Nudge (10/26/03)
• NSA chooses ECC Robert Harley (10/26/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/26/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/26/03)
• Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/26/03)
• Bias Noted in Playing Card Cipher John Savard (10/26/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Chad Hogan (10/26/03)
• Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Colin Andrew Percival (10/26/03)
• Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
• Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andy Robinson (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Michael Amling (10/26/03)
• Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Francois Grieu (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/26/03)
• Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andy Robinson (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/26/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Francois Grieu (10/26/03)
• Re: xor without known key Mxsmanic (10/26/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Francois Grieu (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Roger Schlafly (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Roger Schlafly (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA David Wagner (10/26/03)
• Re: xor without known key Richard Heathfield (10/26/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Roger Schlafly (10/26/03)
• xor without known key Mantorok Redgormor (10/26/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? John Savard (10/26/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Richard Heathfield (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Marcel Martin (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Marcel Martin (10/26/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/26/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" r.e.s. (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Francois Grieu (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Marcel Martin (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Michael Amling (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA DJohn37050 (10/25/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Jeff (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Phil Carmody (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Stang (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Benjamin Choi (10/25/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Foo Bar (10/25/03)
• Black Box Voting G. Orme (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/25/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? George Ou (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/25/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/25/03)
• Re: Can anybody give me some test data? someone (10/25/03)
• Re: encrypting a message with a symmetric key wrong way philbin (10/25/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Michael Amling (10/25/03)
• Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/25/03)
• Re: generators be bound Mok-Kong Shen (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: generators be bound Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Novice (10/25/03)
• Re: Choosing e in RSA Novice (10/24/03)
• Choosing e in RSA Novice (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Anton Stiglic (10/24/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Anton Stiglic (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Gregory G Rose (10/24/03)
• Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Jim Gillogly (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Gregory G Rose (10/24/03)
• MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Anton Spaans (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/24/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/24/03)
• Re: Can anybody give me some test data? Andrew Swallow (10/24/03)
• Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages David C. Partridge (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 Mike (10/24/03)
• Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages David C. Partridge (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Mok-Kong Shen (10/24/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Bill Unruh (10/24/03)
• Re: TSD = Uncle fucker! Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 Jason (10/24/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/24/03)
• Re: TSD = Uncle fucker! Simon Johnson (10/24/03)
• Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages Michael Amling (10/24/03)
• Re: Probability question Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Probability question cymelbird (10/24/03)
• Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/24/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Michael Brown (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? John Savard (10/24/03)
• Re: Matrix Question Shawn (10/24/03)
• Re: Can anybody give me some test data? Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA W. Othman (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/24/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/24/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/24/03)
• Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages David C. Partridge (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Mailman (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Simon Johnson (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/24/03)
• WHY I HATE BOSCHLOO Anonymous (10/24/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Jyrki Lahtonen (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
• I dare speak out futureworlds (10/24/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/24/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
• I dare speak out lcs Mixmaster Remailer (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
• TSD = Uncle fucker! Kristian Olsen (10/24/03)
• WHY I HATE BOSCHLOO edo (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 Anonymous Sender (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
• Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
• WHY I HATE BOSCHLOO Fight Boschloo (10/24/03)
• Re: Can anybody give me some test data? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Can anybody give me some test data? someone (10/24/03)
• Can anybody give me some test data? someone (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Andrew Swallow (10/24/03)
• Re: generators be bound Mok-Kong Shen (10/24/03)
• Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Kristian Olsen (10/24/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Stang (10/24/03)
• Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Kristian Olsen (10/24/03)
• generators be bound Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• BestCrypt - Major Security Flaw Found Adal Chiriliuc (10/24/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Mok-Kong Shen (10/24/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish JohnTromaville (10/24/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/24/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/24/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Marcel Martin (10/23/03)
• Re: Matrix Question Marcel Martin (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• encrypting a message with a symmetric key Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Matrix Question Shawn (10/23/03)
• Re: Matrix Question Nudge (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Markus Jansson (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/23/03)
• How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Johan van der Galien (10/23/03)
• Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Foo Bar (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Paul Rubin (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/23/03)
• Re: OpenSSL C coding guide William Ahern (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Foo Bar (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Foo Bar (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Mads Rasmussen (10/23/03)
• Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? jos sulistyo (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Anton Stiglic (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Foo Bar (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Foo Bar (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Alex Biryukov (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Michael Amling (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
• Re: Base32 implementation? John Hadstate (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Grumble (10/23/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Anton Stiglic (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Bartosz Zoltak (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bill Unruh (10/23/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Bill Unruh (10/23/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Benjamin Choi (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Marcel Martin (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/23/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/23/03)
• Re: an amusing alternative to Base64 David A. Scott (10/23/03)
• Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Sisyphus (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Paul Rubin (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: A new steganographic software for images Michael J. Fromberger (10/23/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/23/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID tiny lizard (10/22/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Phil Carmody (10/22/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Hans Ludwig (10/22/03)
• Re: hash/SHA-1 questions David Wagner (10/22/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Is there any authentication algorithm with Gregory G Rose (10/22/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/22/03)
• Re: How does this work? Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
• Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/22/03)
• an amusing alternative to Base64 Anon (10/22/03)
• Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish John Hadstate (10/22/03)
• Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Phil Frisbie, Jr. (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/22/03)
• Re: Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/22/03)
• VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/22/03)
• Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Kenjis Kaan (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Clay Culver (10/22/03)
• Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? jos sulistyo (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/22/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Michael Amling (10/22/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/22/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Benjamin Choi (10/22/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Panic (10/22/03)
• Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Panic (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
• Re: hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/22/03)
• Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Eldric Bach (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/22/03)
• Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Johannes Wolkerstorfer (10/22/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/22/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Blurry Eyes (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
• Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (10/22/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Jyrki Lahtonen (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/22/03)
• Re: 802.11b open system authentication David Wagner (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/22/03)
• Re: 802.11b open system authentication flip (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
• Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Scott Contini (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
• Good-Turing David Wagner (10/22/03)
• Re: 802.11b open system authentication David Wagner (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/22/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
• Is there any authentication algorithm with jos sulistyo (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
• Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Phil Carmody (10/22/03)
• Re: My Resume PolicySpy (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Phil Carmody (10/22/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis skype CryptWolf (10/22/03)
• Re: 802.11b open system authentication flip (10/22/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/22/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/21/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Unintentional Decaffeination (was Re: Universal re-encryption) thisisme (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" hantheman (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/21/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Gregory G Rose (10/21/03)
• Re: cryptanalysis skype Gregory G Rose (10/21/03)
• Re: actual captured encrypted messages Jim Gillogly (10/21/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Gregory G Rose (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
• Re: How does this work? Simon Johnson (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
• Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Robin Chapman (10/21/03)
• Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• actual captured encrypted messages Russell W. Patterson (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Brad Murray (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Panic (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Anton Stiglic (10/21/03)
• cryptanalysis skype S.Ligthert (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Anton Stiglic (10/21/03)
• Camaleão a software to digital steganography Anderson Rocha (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/21/03)
• Re: How does this work? Gelo Ilzi (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Michael Amling (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Vempu (10/21/03)
• How does this work? Justin Ding (10/21/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
• Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Skybuck Flying (10/21/03)
• Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet David A. Scott (10/21/03)
• Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/21/03)
• Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Ernst Lippe (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Panic (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Anton Stiglic (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Prime number generating function Michael Amling (10/21/03)
• Crypto++ Compression Anand CS (10/21/03)
• Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Michael Brown (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/21/03)
• sci.crypt sandbox? Hans Ludwig (10/21/03)
• Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Andrew Swallow (10/21/03)
• Re: Prime number generating function Panic (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: How much does 'large' mean? Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
• Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Bill Unruh (10/21/03)
• Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
• Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Simon Johnson (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" hantheman (10/21/03)
• Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" wrong way philbin (10/21/03)
• Re: 802.11b open system authentication stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/21/03)
• Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
• Re: Universal re-encryption Simon Johnson (10/21/03)
• Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Skybuck Flying (10/21/03)
• Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB</