sci.crypt
By Date

3092 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

Starting: 09/30/03
Ending: 10/31/03

Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/31/03)
Re: counter mode and data integrity Andrew Swallow (10/31/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC John Hairell (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic G. Orme (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic Rob Warnock (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic G. Orme (10/31/03)
Re: Factoring Integers "near" a power Colin Andrew Percival (10/31/03)
Re: counter mode and data integrity Joerg Platte (10/31/03)
Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Phil Carmody (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic ink (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic joss (10/31/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... puzzolino (10/31/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Marco Era (10/31/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Tom St Denis (10/31/03)
Re: counter mode and data integrity Michael Amling (10/31/03)
Re: counter mode and data integrity flip (10/31/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/31/03)
Re: One-Time_Pad Michael Amling (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic ink (10/31/03)
Re: Basic Crypto info wanted kurt wismer (10/31/03)
I apologize for my previous post... Stephen Cantini (10/31/03)
Re: manual cryptography Jim Gillogly (10/31/03)
Re: Johnny Mnemonic Tanu R. (10/31/03)
Johnny Mnemonic G. Orme (10/31/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
Re: Basic Crypto info wanted Andreas D. Landmark (10/31/03)
Re: counter mode and data integrity Joerg Platte (10/31/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Marco Era (10/31/03)
Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Stefan Seiffarth (10/31/03)
Re: counter mode and data integrity John E. Hadstate (10/31/03)
Re: Provable security against differential cryptanalysis Foo Bar (10/31/03)
Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
counter mode and data integrity Joerg Platte (10/31/03)
How long to break a 512 bit RSA key? Hyper4S (10/31/03)
Re: Basic Crypto info wanted Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/31/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/31/03)
Re: Basic Crypto info wanted flip (10/31/03)
Re: One-Time_Pad Alan Connor (10/31/03)
Re: One-Time_Pad MacGregor K. Phillips (10/31/03)
Basic Crypto info wanted Kevin (10/31/03)
Re: Newbie: Password based encrypting using cryptlib Ajay (10/31/03)
Re: Newbie: Password based encrypting using cryptlib dAve (10/31/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC David Magda (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC David Magda (10/30/03)
Re: One-Time_Pad Alan Connor (10/30/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
Newbie: Password based encrypting using cryptlib Ajay (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC John Hairell (10/30/03)
Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Andrew Swallow (10/30/03)
Re: ARC4 Anton Stiglic (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
Re: What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
One-Time_Pad Neko (10/30/03)
Re: Provable security against differential cryptanalysis Tom St Denis (10/30/03)
Provable security against differential cryptanalysis Benjamin Choi (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/30/03)
What ? I can't use cryptography in my app... puzzolino (10/30/03)
ARC4 Konstantin Larionov (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography Bill Unruh (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography John E. Hadstate (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/30/03)
Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (10/30/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Roger Schlafly (10/30/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/30/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/30/03)
Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Le Chaud Lapin (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography Jeff (10/30/03)
Re: manual cryptography Andrew Swallow (10/30/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Anton Stiglic (10/30/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/30/03)
Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Jan Panteltje (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
NIZK with deterministic prover Gelo Ilzi (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Ulrich Wurst (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC JohnTromaville (10/29/03)
(URL) A new PRNG of Marsaglia Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC JohnTromaville (10/29/03)
Re: First Commercial Optical Processor Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: substitution cipher CBC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Phil Carmody (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Anton Stiglic (10/29/03)
Re: First Commercial Optical Processor dsr_at_Florence.edu (10/29/03)
Re: Another Thawte Challenge... Jubilation T. Cornpone, CSA (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography John Hadstate (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Gregory G Rose (10/29/03)
First Commercial Optical Processor cesar bremer (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/29/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Louis Granboulan (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Grumble (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Bill Unruh (10/29/03)
Another Thawte Challenge... Mike Curry (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC David A. Scott (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Mailman (10/29/03)
substitution cipher CBC Michael Scott (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Verfication of security protocol Ulf Reiman (10/29/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Colin Andrew Percival (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Bill Unruh (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography John Savard (10/29/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Tom St Denis (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Richard Herring (10/29/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Jyrki Lahtonen (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Mok-Kong Shen (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/29/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/29/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Benjamin Choi (10/29/03)
Re: need advice Tanu R. (10/29/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost John A. Malley (10/29/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Michael Amling (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Victor S. Miller (10/29/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost robertocarlos (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Scott Contini (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/29/03)
Re: Have you seen this before??? nemo outis (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Greg Doyle (10/29/03)
Vigenere++ Proposal of a (new?) cipher Stephen Cantini (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Paul Crowley (10/29/03)
Re: manual cryptography Simon Johnson (10/29/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Gerry Myerson (10/29/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC David A. Scott (10/29/03)
Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Bill Unruh (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Bill Unruh (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: Naive encryption schemes Bill Unruh (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group Marcel Martin (10/28/03)
Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Gelo Ilzi (10/28/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/28/03)
Re: Generators of cyclic group John Savard (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC JohnTromaville (10/28/03)
Generators of cyclic group Robin Lavall?e (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/28/03)
Re: Naive encryption schemes John Savard (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Tom St Denis (10/28/03)
Re: need advice James L. Dean (10/28/03)
manual cryptography Neko (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/28/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Michael Amling (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
Re: Naive encryption schemes Kev (10/28/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost cesar bremer (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Grumble (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Bob Silverman (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost cesar bremer (10/28/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Richard Herring (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: Have you seen this before??? Michael Amling (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/28/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/28/03)
Re: need advice Simon Johnson (10/28/03)
Re: Have you seen this before??? Richard Heathfield (10/28/03)
Re: Have you seen this before??? Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
Have you seen this before??? InMemoriam (10/28/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/28/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Richard Heathfield (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/28/03)
Re: need advice Tanu R. (10/28/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Bryan Olson (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/28/03)
Re: How weak is this idea? JohnTromaville (10/28/03)
Re: xor without known key kurt wismer (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/28/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" r.e.s. (10/28/03)
Re: How weak is this idea? Gregory G Rose (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/28/03)
Re: How weak is this idea? Mike Curry (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/28/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Gregory G Rose (10/28/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Scott Contini (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Scott Contini (10/28/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Phil Carmody (10/28/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/28/03)
Re: need advice David A. Scott (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC DJohn37050 (10/27/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Jim Gillogly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Jan Panteltje (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC David A. Scott (10/27/03)
Re: Naive encryption schemes Gregory G Rose (10/27/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Anton Spaans (10/27/03)
Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption Sean (10/27/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Joe Peschel (10/27/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
How weak is this idea? JohnTromaville (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: need advice James L. Dean (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: need advice James L. Dean (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Ulrich Wurst (10/27/03)
Naive encryption schemes Chuck Rittersdorf (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Anton Stiglic (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Gregory G Rose (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Anton Stiglic (10/27/03)
need advice Neko (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Jim Ford (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Robert Harley (10/27/03)
Re: Factoring Integers "near" a power Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
Re: Factoring Integers "near" a power Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Factoring Integers "near" a power Stush (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mok-Kong Shen (10/27/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Michael Amling (10/27/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost Michael Amling (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Kristian Gj�steen (10/27/03)
Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andrew Swallow (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Bill Unruh (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andy Robinson (10/27/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: Good-Turing Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
Re: actual captured encrypted messages Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Phil Carmody (10/27/03)
Re: xor without known key Joe Peschel (10/27/03)
Re: Using 10101010 as padding. Douglas A. Gwyn (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Lassi Hippel�inen (10/27/03)
Re: cryptanalysis cost David Wagner (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
cryptanalysis cost robertocarlos (10/27/03)
Re: software implementation of DES flip (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
software implementation of DES xam (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Alan Connor (10/27/03)
Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Francois Grieu (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Michael Amling (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Alan Connor (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Scott Contini (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Alan Connor (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC DJohn37050 (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC John Savard (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Andrew Swallow (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Mxsmanic (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Roger Schlafly (10/27/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Tom St Denis (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC newstome_at_comcast.net (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC Marcel Martin (10/27/03)
Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andrew Swallow (10/27/03)
Re: NSA chooses ECC DJohn37050 (10/27/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Nudge (10/26/03)
NSA chooses ECC Robert Harley (10/26/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/26/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/26/03)
Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/26/03)
Bias Noted in Playing Card Cipher John Savard (10/26/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Chad Hogan (10/26/03)
Re: Note on employing division for substitution purposes Colin Andrew Percival (10/26/03)
Note on employing division for substitution purposes Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andy Robinson (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Michael Amling (10/26/03)
Re: Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Francois Grieu (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/26/03)
Non-forgable authorization keys for shareware registration Andy Robinson (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/26/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Francois Grieu (10/26/03)
Re: xor without known key Mxsmanic (10/26/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Francois Grieu (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Roger Schlafly (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Roger Schlafly (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA David Wagner (10/26/03)
Re: xor without known key Richard Heathfield (10/26/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Roger Schlafly (10/26/03)
xor without known key Mantorok Redgormor (10/26/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? John Savard (10/26/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Re: Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Is this right? Question about SSL and PKI... Ohaya (10/26/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Richard Heathfield (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Marcel Martin (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Marcel Martin (10/26/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/26/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" r.e.s. (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Bill Unruh (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Francois Grieu (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Marcel Martin (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Michael Amling (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA DJohn37050 (10/25/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Jeff (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Phil Carmody (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Stang (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Benjamin Choi (10/25/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Foo Bar (10/25/03)
Black Box Voting G. Orme (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/25/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/25/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? George Ou (10/25/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? George Ou (10/25/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/25/03)
Re: Can anybody give me some test data? someone (10/25/03)
Re: encrypting a message with a symmetric key wrong way philbin (10/25/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Joe Peschel (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Michael Amling (10/25/03)
Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/25/03)
Re: generators be bound Mok-Kong Shen (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Gregory G Rose (10/25/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: generators be bound Tom St Denis (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Novice (10/25/03)
Re: Choosing e in RSA Novice (10/24/03)
Choosing e in RSA Novice (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Anton Stiglic (10/24/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Anton Stiglic (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Gregory G Rose (10/24/03)
Re: MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Jim Gillogly (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Gregory G Rose (10/24/03)
MD5 and SHA-1 Digest: What is the probability of repeating hash-values? Anton Spaans (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/24/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/24/03)
Re: Can anybody give me some test data? Andrew Swallow (10/24/03)
Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages David C. Partridge (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 Mike (10/24/03)
Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages David C. Partridge (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Mok-Kong Shen (10/24/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Bill Unruh (10/24/03)
Re: TSD = Uncle fucker! Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 Jason (10/24/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/24/03)
Re: TSD = Uncle fucker! Simon Johnson (10/24/03)
Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages Michael Amling (10/24/03)
Re: Probability question Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Probability question cymelbird (10/24/03)
Re: Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/24/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Michael Brown (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? John Savard (10/24/03)
Re: Matrix Question Shawn (10/24/03)
Re: Can anybody give me some test data? Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA W. Othman (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/24/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/24/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/24/03)
Standard for partially encrypted (or signed) messages David C. Partridge (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Mailman (10/24/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Simon Johnson (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Richard Heathfield (10/24/03)
WHY I HATE BOSCHLOO Anonymous (10/24/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Jyrki Lahtonen (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
I dare speak out futureworlds (10/24/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/24/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
I dare speak out lcs Mixmaster Remailer (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
TSD = Uncle fucker! Kristian Olsen (10/24/03)
WHY I HATE BOSCHLOO edo (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 Anonymous Sender (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
Re: BEST OF: Richard Heathfield OFFICIAL TROLL FEEDER '2002 edo (10/24/03)
WHY I HATE BOSCHLOO Fight Boschloo (10/24/03)
Re: Can anybody give me some test data? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Can anybody give me some test data? someone (10/24/03)
Can anybody give me some test data? someone (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Andrew Swallow (10/24/03)
Re: generators be bound Mok-Kong Shen (10/24/03)
Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Kristian Olsen (10/24/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Stang (10/24/03)
Re: Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Is it OK with newbie questions in this NG? Kristian Olsen (10/24/03)
generators be bound Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
BestCrypt - Major Security Flaw Found Adal Chiriliuc (10/24/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Mok-Kong Shen (10/24/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/24/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish JohnTromaville (10/24/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Marcel Martin (10/24/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/24/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/24/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/24/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Marcel Martin (10/23/03)
Re: Matrix Question Marcel Martin (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
encrypting a message with a symmetric key Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Matrix Question Shawn (10/23/03)
Re: Matrix Question Nudge (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Markus Jansson (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/23/03)
How To Handle Huge Numbers In 2048 Bit RSA Johan van der Galien (10/23/03)
Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Foo Bar (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Paul Rubin (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Gregory G Rose (10/23/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/23/03)
Re: OpenSSL C coding guide William Ahern (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Foo Bar (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Foo Bar (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Mads Rasmussen (10/23/03)
Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? jos sulistyo (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Anton Stiglic (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Foo Bar (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Phil Carmody (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Foo Bar (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Alex Biryukov (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Michael Amling (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
looking at Diffie Hellman Novice (10/23/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Hadstate (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Grumble (10/23/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Anton Stiglic (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Bartosz Zoltak (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bill Unruh (10/23/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/23/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Bill Unruh (10/23/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Benjamin Choi (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? J. Campbell (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Marcel Martin (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/23/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/23/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/23/03)
Re: an amusing alternative to Base64 David A. Scott (10/23/03)
Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Sisyphus (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Paul Rubin (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: A new steganographic software for images Michael J. Fromberger (10/23/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/23/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/23/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/23/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID tiny lizard (10/22/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Phil Carmody (10/22/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Hans Ludwig (10/22/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions David Wagner (10/22/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Is there any authentication algorithm with Gregory G Rose (10/22/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/22/03)
Re: How does this work? Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
Re: Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/22/03)
an amusing alternative to Base64 Anon (10/22/03)
Re: Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish John Hadstate (10/22/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Phil Frisbie, Jr. (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/22/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/22/03)
VMPC stream cipher - no short cycles possible Bartosz Zoltak (10/22/03)
Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Kenjis Kaan (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Clay Culver (10/22/03)
Are there any authentication algorithms with runtime changeable key length? jos sulistyo (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/22/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Michael Amling (10/22/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/22/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Benjamin Choi (10/22/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Anton Stiglic (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Panic (10/22/03)
Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Panic (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/22/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/22/03)
Looking for Streaming Cipher alternative to Blowfish Eldric Bach (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/22/03)
Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Johannes Wolkerstorfer (10/22/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Richard Heathfield (10/22/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Blurry Eyes (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (10/22/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Jyrki Lahtonen (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/22/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication David Wagner (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/22/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication flip (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/22/03)
Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Scott Contini (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
Good-Turing David Wagner (10/22/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication David Wagner (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/22/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/22/03)
Is there any authentication algorithm with jos sulistyo (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
Re: Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Phil Carmody (10/22/03)
Re: My Resume PolicySpy (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Phil Carmody (10/22/03)
Re: cryptanalysis skype CryptWolf (10/22/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication flip (10/22/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/22/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/22/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/21/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Unintentional Decaffeination (was Re: Universal re-encryption) thisisme (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" hantheman (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/21/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Gregory G Rose (10/21/03)
Re: cryptanalysis skype Gregory G Rose (10/21/03)
Re: actual captured encrypted messages Jim Gillogly (10/21/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Gregory G Rose (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
Re: How does this work? Simon Johnson (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
Re: Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Robin Chapman (10/21/03)
Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
actual captured encrypted messages Russell W. Patterson (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Brad Murray (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Panic (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Anton Stiglic (10/21/03)
cryptanalysis skype S.Ligthert (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Anton Stiglic (10/21/03)
Camale�o a software to digital steganography Anderson Rocha (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/21/03)
Re: How does this work? Gelo Ilzi (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Michael Amling (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Vempu (10/21/03)
How does this work? Justin Ding (10/21/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
Re: Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Skybuck Flying (10/21/03)
Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet David A. Scott (10/21/03)
Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/21/03)
Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Ernst Lippe (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Rijndael S-Box representation in GF(2^4) Panic (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Anton Stiglic (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Prime number generating function Michael Amling (10/21/03)
Crypto++ Compression Anand CS (10/21/03)
Re: sci.crypt sandbox? Michael Brown (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/21/03)
sci.crypt sandbox? Hans Ludwig (10/21/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Andrew Swallow (10/21/03)
Re: Prime number generating function Panic (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Bill Unruh (10/21/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/21/03)
Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Simon Johnson (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" hantheman (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" wrong way philbin (10/21/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Simon Johnson (10/21/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Skybuck Flying (10/21/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Skybuck Flying (10/21/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Sisyphus (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" David Wagner (10/21/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication David Wagner (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/21/03)
crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? Kenjis Kaan (10/21/03)
Improved Cryptanalysis of SecurID Scott Contini (10/21/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul J Gans (10/21/03)
Prime number generating function Vincent Granville (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/21/03)
Re: 802.11b open system authentication flip (10/21/03)
Re: cipher for Linux or Windows Scott Contini (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/21/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/21/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Cypher (10/21/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Tom St Denis (10/21/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John M. Gamble (10/21/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Mok-Kong Shen (10/21/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/21/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/21/03)
Re: Encrypting a file without using a password Ritchie (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: Encrypting a file without using a password John Hadstate (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? dsr_at_Florence.edu (10/20/03)
802.11b open system authentication Bruce Ding (10/20/03)
Re: Using 10101010 as padding. Simon Johnson (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Dr Chaos (10/20/03)
Re: Encrypting a file without using a password n1pop_at_hotmail.com (10/20/03)
Re: Using 10101010 as padding. Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Paul Rubin (10/20/03)
Re: Encrypting a file without using a password Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: Challenge - Win one million euros Jubilation T. Cornpone, CSA (10/20/03)
Re: Want to learn cryptology with me? Panic (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN newstome_at_comcast.net (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Chosen Cyphertext Attack Security wefgw_at_bang.com (10/20/03)
Want to learn cryptology with me? Chad Hogan (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT John A. Malley (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN newstome_at_comcast.net (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Gregory G Rose (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN newstome_at_comcast.net (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT Kent Briggs (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: OpenSSL C coding guide S.Ligthert (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: OpenSSL C coding guide S.Ligthert (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Ernst Lippe (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Pathos (10/20/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Hadstate (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Anton Stiglic (10/20/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Anton Stiglic (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT Kent Briggs (10/20/03)
Encrypting a file without using a password Ritchie (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT Kent Briggs (10/20/03)
cipher for Linux or Windows Anon (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Michael Amling (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Andrew Swallow (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Michael Amling (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
just an idea for packet protocol using ECB Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: Universal re-encryption Ernst Lippe (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Matthijs van Duin (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Ulrich Wurst (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Universal re-encryption Peter Fairbrother (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Francois Grieu (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? wrong way philbin (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Ulrich Wurst (10/20/03)
Re: Can we export 256 bits Cripto software to USA? Bill Unruh (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" wrong way philbin (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: Using 10101010 as padding. Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Grumble (10/20/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: How much does 'large' mean? Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Tom St Denis (10/20/03)
Re: Can we export 256 bits Cripto software to USA? Lassi Hippel�inen (10/20/03)
Re: Challenge - Win one million euros Lassi Hippel�inen (10/20/03)
Re: ECB security Ulrich Wurst (10/20/03)
Re: Using 10101010 as padding. Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/20/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/20/03)
Using 10101010 as padding. Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
ECB security Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: best encryption + mode for network packets ? Skybuck Flying (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Rickey Braddam (10/20/03)
Re: Can we export 256 bits Cripto software to USA? Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Francois Grieu (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT John A. Malley (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Joe Peschel (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Joe Peschel (10/20/03)
Re: Can we export 256 bits Cripto software to USA? Joe Peschel (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/20/03)
How much does 'large' mean? Pathos (10/20/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Francois Grieu (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Phil Carmody (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN - OT John A. Malley (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Joe Peschel (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Kent Briggs (10/20/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. TC (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Matthew Skala (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Can we export 256 bits Cripto software to USA? cesar bremer (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul J Gans (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul J Gans (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul J Gans (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Scott Contini (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Andrew Swallow (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Gregory G Rose (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Bryan Olson (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Joe Peschel (10/20/03)
cbc or ecb mode in idea/aes in cryptoapi-0.1.0 crypt_at_sycom.zzn.com (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Dr Chaos (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Dr Chaos (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Dr Chaos (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Dr Chaos (10/20/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Dr Chaos (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/20/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/20/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Gregory G Rose (10/20/03)
Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Mok-Kong Shen (10/20/03)
Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher" Jim Steuert (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/19/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: OpenSSL C coding guide Paul Rubin (10/19/03)
Re: OpenSSL C coding guide Paul Schlyter (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Simon Johnson (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Ernst Lippe (10/19/03)
Re: A new steganographic software for images Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN David Wagner (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN David Wagner (10/19/03)
Where to get WASTE goon (10/19/03)
WASTE Aram Whitcombe (10/19/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? John Savard (10/19/03)
Re: B'day Attack on HMAC with Seq Nums David Wagner (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? John Savard (10/19/03)
A new steganographic software for images Anderson Rocha (10/19/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Markus Jansson (10/19/03)
OpenSSL C coding guide S.Ligthert (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/19/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Kent Briggs (10/19/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/19/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Brian Gladman (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Panic (10/19/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Francois Grieu (10/19/03)
Re: best encryption + mode for network packets ? stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Francois Grieu (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Anon (10/19/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Francois Grieu (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Panic (10/19/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Douglas A. Gwyn (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Micah Cowan (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: Challenge - Win one million euros Vempu (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Paul Schlyter (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Roger Schlafly (10/19/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/19/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/19/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. kurt wismer (10/19/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Mxsmanic (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN John A. Malley (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/19/03)
Re: end conclusion for network packet encrypting/decrypting with AES: Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: end conclusion for network packet encrypting/decrypting with AES: Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul J Gans (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul J Gans (10/19/03)
end conclusion for network packet encrypting/decrypting with AES: Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
end conclusion for network packet encrypting/decrypting with AES: Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: follow up: some modes explained, security, ECB needs padding ? Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: Is encrypting/decrypting network packets like this safe ? Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: follow up: some modes explained, security, ECB needs padding ? Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
follow up: easier one to read Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
follow up: some modes explained, security, ECB needs padding ? Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Scott Contini (10/19/03)
Re: B'day Attack on HMAC with Seq Nums Mark Shelor (10/19/03)
best encryption + mode for network packets ? Skybuck Flying (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Douglas A. Gwyn (10/19/03)
Re: B'day Attack on HMAC with Seq Nums David Wagner (10/19/03)
B'day Attack on HMAC with Seq Nums Mark Shelor (10/19/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Peter Fairbrother (10/19/03)
Bestcrypt: Hidden containers and NTFS - Experience? Jens Roeben (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Rickey Braddam (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Phil Carmody (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/18/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Markus Jansson (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN John Savard (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN John Savard (10/18/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? John Savard (10/18/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Ian (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Paul Rubin (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Peter Fairbrother (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Andrew Swallow (10/18/03)
NX Marcel Martin (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN John E. Hadstate (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/18/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Michael Amling (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Michael Amling (10/18/03)
Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Francois Grieu (10/18/03)
Re: Challenge - Win one million euros Chiron Paixos (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN Peter Fairbrother (10/18/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Shill (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Michael Amling (10/18/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bodo Moeller (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/18/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Michael Amling (10/18/03)
Re: WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN John E. Hadstate (10/18/03)
Re: Challenge - Win one million euros Alan Storm (10/18/03)
Re: Challenge - Win one million euros John Eskie (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question John E. Hadstate (10/18/03)
Challenge - Win one million euros Alan Storm (10/18/03)
WHY TO GO BERNSTEIN David A. Scott (10/18/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Andrew Swallow (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Tom St Denis (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws? Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Phil Carmody (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Benjamin Choi (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Richard Heathfield (10/18/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Douglas A. Gwyn (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Paul Schlyter (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Paul Schlyter (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Paul Rubin (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Matthue Gera (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Matthue Gera (10/18/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge George Ou (10/18/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Ian (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Benjamin Choi (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Benjamin Choi (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Benjamin Choi (10/18/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician John Savard (10/18/03)
Those hash test vectors Tom St Denis (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Michael Amling (10/18/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Edwin Clark (10/18/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Mark Shelor (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Mark Shelor (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Panic (10/18/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Matthue Gera (10/18/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/18/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Eric Young (10/18/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Markus Jansson (10/18/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Eris Pluvia (10/18/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul Rubin (10/17/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Eric Young (10/17/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/17/03)
Re: Base32 implementation? J. Campbell (10/17/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question David A. Scott (10/17/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO David A. Scott (10/17/03)
Re: Bonehead basic crypto question Paul Rubin (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/17/03)
Bonehead basic crypto question None (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician George Cox (10/17/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Nudge (10/17/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Tom St Denis (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Tom St Denis (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Tom St Denis (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bill Unruh (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Andrew Swallow (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Ernst Lippe (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Paul Rubin (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bill Unruh (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Brian Gladman (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Michael Amling (10/17/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/17/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Eric Young (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/17/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Joe Peschel (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/17/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Ernst Lippe (10/17/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Phil Carmody (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography ink (10/17/03)
Base32 implementation? John Eskie (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO David A. Scott (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Q: Correlations Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Brian Gladman (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/17/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/17/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Grumble (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Lassi Hippel�inen (10/17/03)
Re: Encryption for IPv6 Lassi Hippel�inen (10/17/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Simon Johnson (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/17/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Andrew Morgan (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Encryption for IPv6 David Wagner (10/17/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Andreas Koltes (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/17/03)
Re: Encryption for IPv6 Lassi Hippel�inen (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Lassi Hippel�inen (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Joe Peschel (10/17/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Joe Peschel (10/17/03)
Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Richard Heathfield (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/17/03)
Is encrypting/decrypting network packets like this safe ? Skybuck Flying (10/17/03)
New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine. Matthue Gera (10/17/03)
Re: Encryption for IPv6 John E. Hadstate (10/17/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions David Wagner (10/17/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician John Savard (10/17/03)
Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function? John Savard (10/17/03)
Re: Encryption for IPv6 stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Gregory G Rose (10/17/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO David A. Scott (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Micah Cowan (10/17/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/17/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/17/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Douglas A. Gwyn (10/17/03)
Encryption for IPv6 John E. Hadstate (10/17/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Phil Carmody (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Nudge (10/16/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Ernst Lippe (10/16/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Joe Peschel (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Andrew Morgan (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Erwann ABALEA (10/16/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO David A. Scott (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/16/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge George Ou (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician No One (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician George Cox (10/16/03)
Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function? Henrick Hellstr�m (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Jose Castejon-Amenedo (10/16/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Ernst Lippe (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician cymelbird (10/16/03)
Re: new Web site at cryptograph.org Michael (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Andrew Swallow (10/16/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mok-Kong Shen (10/16/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? J. Campbell (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions Michael Amling (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Michael Amling (10/16/03)
Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the DJohn37050 (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions Francois Grieu (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Grumble (10/16/03)
Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function? Michael Amling (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions Michael Amling (10/16/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Ernst Lippe (10/16/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/16/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Bill Unruh (10/16/03)
Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function? Tom St Denis (10/16/03)
Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function? DJohn37050 (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Lassi Hippel�inen (10/16/03)
why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function? #ZHOU SUJING# (10/16/03)
Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge John Veldhuis (10/16/03)
Re: new Web site at cryptograph.org Lord Shaolin (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mxsmanic (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mxsmanic (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Mok-Kong Shen (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Eric Young (10/16/03)
Re: new Web site at cryptograph.org Mok-Kong Shen (10/16/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Tanu R. (10/16/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Ulrich Wurst (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Eric Young (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/16/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Francois Grieu (10/16/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/16/03)
new Web site at cryptograph.org Michael (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/16/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Paul Rubin (10/16/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Francois Grieu (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions David Wagner (10/16/03)
Re: VIA's new chip comes with hardware AES implementation and true RNG Andrew Swallow (10/16/03)
Re: Public Exponent Attack Scott Contini (10/16/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mailman (10/16/03)
Re: SHA-256 performance on x86 Matt Taylor (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Roger Schlafly (10/16/03)
Re: hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/16/03)
hash/SHA-1 questions r.e.s. (10/16/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? user_at_domain.invalid (10/16/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? John Savard (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul Rubin (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/16/03)
Re: vote fraud Mack (10/16/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/16/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Micah Cowan (10/15/03)
VIA's new chip comes with hardware AES implementation and true RNG Nudge (10/15/03)
Public Exponent Attack Clemens Rhein (10/15/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Jose Castejon-Amenedo (10/15/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Michael Scott (10/15/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician George Cox (10/15/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Heathfield (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Tom St Denis (10/15/03)
SHA-256 performance on x86 Shill (10/15/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Anton Stiglic (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul Rubin (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys Ulrich Wurst (10/15/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Ulrich Wurst (10/15/03)
Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? J. Campbell (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? J. Campbell (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Andrew Swallow (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Marco Era (10/15/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Eric Young (10/15/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Andrew Swallow (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/15/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Phil Carmody (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? DJohn37050 (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Andrew Swallow (10/15/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Jose Castejon-Amenedo (10/15/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors David Wagner (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys David Wagner (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys Andrew Swallow (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode David Wagner (10/15/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Eric Young (10/15/03)
Re: BEALE questions Chris (10/15/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: Simple authenticated channel Matthijs van Duin (10/15/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Michael Amling (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Panic (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Panic (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys Francois Grieu (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Mailman (10/15/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Francois Grieu (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Mxsmanic (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Mack (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? John Savard (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Marco Era (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... David A. Scott (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/15/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Panic (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Thomas Anderson (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Panic (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Lassi Hippel�inen (10/15/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Marco Era (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... wrong way philbin (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: BEALE questions Joe Peschel (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/15/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys Ulrich Wurst (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys Ulrich Wurst (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/15/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Andreas Koltes (10/15/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" wrong way philbin (10/15/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Mark Shelor (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? ink (10/15/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys Simon Johnson (10/15/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/15/03)
Re: BEALE questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/15/03)
Re: vote fraud Douglas A. Gwyn (10/15/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Paul Rubin (10/15/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/15/03)
Re: One-sided authentication for small micros? Nicol So (10/15/03)
One-sided authentication for small micros? Jim Kalafut (10/15/03)
BEALE questions Chris (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Paul Rubin (10/15/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Michael Amling (10/15/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Michael Amling (10/15/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... wrong way philbin (10/15/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Nicol So (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul J Gans (10/15/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul J Gans (10/15/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/15/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Rickey Braddam (10/15/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/15/03)
Re: Simple authenticated channel Paul Rubin (10/15/03)
Re: Simple authenticated channel Matthijs van Duin (10/15/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/14/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Phil Carmody (10/14/03)
Re: code for generating irreducible polynomials Phil Carmody (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Heathfield (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Vernon Schryver (10/14/03)
Re: vote fraud Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Andrew Swallow (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: vote fraud Zack Best (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode David Wagner (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/14/03)
code for generating irreducible polynomials Anton Stiglic (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Thomas Anderson (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Panic (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/14/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Phil Carmody (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Jim Gillogly (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/14/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? Tom St Denis (10/14/03)
Re: Full-digraphs and trigraphs tests for VMPC cipher Bartosz Zoltak (10/14/03)
Re: Impact of IDEA's weak keys David Wagner (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography tcne (10/14/03)
Re: T.S.D. Why do you use the word "uber" so much? John Veldhuis (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Ernst Lippe (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: Simple authenticated channel Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Thomas Anderson (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Henrick Hellstr�m (10/14/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Ernst Lippe (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography tcne (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Ernst Lippe (10/14/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Michael Amling (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Markus Jansson (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Panic (10/14/03)
Re: "incrementing" ecb mode Henrick Hellstr�m (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... wrong way philbin (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Marco (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Markus Jansson (10/14/03)
Re: Full-digraphs and trigraphs tests for VMPC cipher Michael Amling (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Herring (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
"incrementing" ecb mode Peter Fairbrother (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Phil Carmody (10/14/03)
Full-digraphs and trigraphs tests for VMPC cipher Bartosz Zoltak (10/14/03)
Simple authenticated channel Matthijs van Duin (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Panic (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Generation/security of initialisation vectors Henrick Hellstr�m (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/14/03)
Generation/security of initialisation vectors Andreas Koltes (10/14/03)
Re: Newby simple question... Ulrich Wurst (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Impact of IDEA's weak keys Ulrich Wurst (10/14/03)
Newby simple question... Marco (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Simon Johnson (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul Schlyter (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Scott Fluhrer (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Heathfield (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Heathfield (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Richard Heathfield (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... David A. Scott (10/14/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography cascade (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/14/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Thomas Wu (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Roger Schlafly (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Jim Gillogly (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... David A. Scott (10/14/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Jim Gillogly (10/14/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO David A. Scott (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Benjamin Choi (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Thomas Anderson (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Paul Rubin (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David M (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/14/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... wrong way philbin (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Joe Peschel (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/14/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Mok-Kong Shen (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography tcne (10/14/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/14/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul Rubin (10/13/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Richard Heathfield (10/13/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Chris Jones (10/13/03)
Re: Cracking SSL stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/13/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Simon Johnson (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Heathfield (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/13/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Paul Rubin (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/13/03)
Re: Cracking SSL mhamrick (10/13/03)
Re: DNA Computers John M. Dlugosz (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Paul J Gans (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/13/03)
Re: DNA Computers tcne (10/13/03)
Re: DNA Computers tcne (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/13/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? wrong way philbin (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David M (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Foo Bar (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Fernando (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/13/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Mack (10/13/03)
Re: The Passing of a Mathematician Marc Olschok (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Herring (10/13/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Richard Herring (10/13/03)
Which algorithm would YOU choose for... Panic (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Panic (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Mok-Kong Shen (10/13/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Jens-Are Amundsen (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Jens-Are Amundsen (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/13/03)
Re: Cycles in a random bijective mapping Francois Grieu (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tanu R. (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/13/03)
Re: DNA Computers Alan Yont (10/13/03)
Re: DNA Computers Alan Yont (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: Cycles in a random bijective mapping Michael Amling (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography tcne (10/13/03)
Re: Kalai's algorithm for fast, factored random numbers Scott Contini (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/13/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? John Savard (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Scott Contini (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/13/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation John Savard (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
The Passing of a Mathematician John Savard (10/13/03)
Re: vote fraud Francois Grieu (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/13/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation Christophe Devine (10/13/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/13/03)
Kalai's algorithm for fast, factored random numbers Nomen Nescio (10/13/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Mxsmanic (10/13/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Micah Cowan (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/12/03)
Re: MD5 question Matthew Skala (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/12/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Christian Faulhammer (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Michael Amling (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/12/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Phil Carmody (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet cascade (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Ciphertext Stealing John Savard (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet kurt wismer (10/12/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Anne & Lynn Wheeler (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/12/03)
Re: DNA Computers John Schutkeker (10/12/03)
Re: DNA Computers John Schutkeker (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation Sasha (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Douglas A. Gwyn (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Rickey Braddam (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Yahoo mail id Mxsmanic (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Yahoo mail id cafe (10/12/03)
Re: DNA Computers Ash Wyllie (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud G. Orme (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/12/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation Scott Fluhrer (10/12/03)
Re: Yahoo mail id TC (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/12/03)
Re: Cracking SSL George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Mxsmanic (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mack (10/12/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/12/03)
Re: vote fraud Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/12/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/12/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO CryptWolf (10/12/03)
Re: Ciphertext Stealing Panic (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/12/03)
Re: Yahoo mail id David Sexton (10/12/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Mack (10/12/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet kurt wismer (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Michael Amling (10/11/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Ciphertext Stealing Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Cycles in a random bijective mapping Michael Amling (10/11/03)
Re: vote fraud Roger Schlafly (10/11/03)
Re: vote fraud Paul Rubin (10/11/03)
Re: Ciphertext Stealing David A. Scott (10/11/03)
Ciphertext Stealing Panic (10/11/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Roger Schlafly (10/11/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/11/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation Michael Amling (10/11/03)
Re: vote fraud Douglas A. Gwyn (10/11/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/11/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Henrick Hellstr�m (10/11/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Foo Bar (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Foo Bar (10/11/03)
Re: DNA Computers Jim Gillogly (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: vote fraud Paul Rubin (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: DNA Computers Douglas A. Gwyn (10/11/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Roger Schlafly (10/11/03)
Re: vote fraud Douglas A. Gwyn (10/11/03)
Re: e-voting Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet Douglas A. Gwyn (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: e-voting G. Orme (10/11/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/11/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/11/03)
Re: Yahoo mail id m_houllier (10/11/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/11/03)
Re: Cracking SSL Daniel Skinner (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: e-voting Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
DNA Computers John Schutkeker (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
vote fraud G. Orme (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Foo Bar (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Foo Bar (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/11/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/11/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mack (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Cycles in a random bijective mapping Bartosz Zoltak (10/11/03)
Why VME is bad Simon Johnson (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Simon Johnson (10/11/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Cristiano (10/11/03)
Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet George Ou (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/11/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Paul Schlyter (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Micah Cowan (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Micah Cowan (10/11/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Micah Cowan (10/11/03)
Yahoo mail id Reddy (10/11/03)
Re: e-voting G. Orme (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Rob D. (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Bryan Olson (10/11/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Zulfikar Ramzan (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Cycles in a random bijective mapping Ernst Lippe (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Jimmy Page (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Cycles in a random bijective mapping David Wagner (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/11/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Michael Amling (10/11/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Mok-Kong Shen (10/11/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Brian Gladman (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Mxsmanic (10/11/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/11/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" John A. Malley (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/10/03)
Cycles in a random bijective mapping Francois Grieu (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John A. Malley (10/10/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Enhanced Presentations with PowerPoint DualPoint (10/10/03)
Re: Identity AES transformation Christophe Devine (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Anton Stiglic (10/10/03)
Identity AES transformation SKH (10/10/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John Hairell (10/10/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: SHA-1 Benchmarks Shill (10/10/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John Hairell (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Paul Schlyter (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification dave manley (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Paul Schlyter (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Panic (10/10/03)
Quisquater and Couvreur's 1982 paper Jim Ford (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
Re: SSL v2.0 Eric Young (10/10/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet cascade (10/10/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet cascade (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification cymelbird (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC stefek.zaba_at_hp.com (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
non-prime-number based code Vioxel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" + "Primes in P" Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Anton Stiglic (10/10/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Adam Berent (10/10/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? wrong way philbin (10/10/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Panic (10/10/03)
Re: ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" + "Primes in P" Chris Card (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Michael Amling (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Foo Bar (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Cracking SSL Mike Curry (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
SSL v2.0 Jens-Are Amundsen (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
ARE AMERICANS FREE TO BREAK CRYTPO David A. Scott (10/10/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations David A. Scott (10/10/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
re:MegaSnakeOil David A. Scott (10/10/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? David A. Scott (10/10/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" John E. Hadstate (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Fernando (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Haldir (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Fernando (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Ulrich Wurst (10/10/03)
Re: AES optimizations for different implemenations Haldir (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Haldir (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/10/03)
AES optimizations for different implemenations Panic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Erwann ABALEA (10/10/03)
Re: CPU usage Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Erwann ABALEA (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Cristiano (10/10/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Andrew Morgan (10/10/03)
SHA-1 Benchmarks Andrew Morgan (10/10/03)
[SSL-Talk List FAQ] Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ v1.1.1 Shannon Appel (10/10/03)
CPU usage Fernando (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tanu R. (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Roger Schlafly (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Andrew Morgan (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Jason Freidman (10/10/03)
Re: FIPS140 Certification Paul Rubin (10/10/03)
re:MegaSnakeOil Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Lassi Hippel�inen (10/10/03)
FIPS140 Certification Andrew Morgan (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Schlyter (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: David Wagner where are you? wrong way philbin (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bryan Olson (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bryan Olson (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bryan Olson (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? TC (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bryan Olson (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Benjamin Choi (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bryan Olson (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Gregory G Rose (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Gregory G Rose (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Paul Sheer (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bryan Olson (10/10/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography D. J. Bernstein (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Roger Schlafly (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Roger Schlafly (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Gregory G Rose (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Gregory G Rose (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Roger Schlafly (10/10/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Gregory G Rose (10/10/03)
Release 1.4 of my AES implementation Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Gregory G Rose (10/10/03)
Re: e-voting Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Andrew Swallow (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John A. Malley (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/10/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John Savard (10/10/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Andrew Swallow (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Joe Peschel (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/10/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David Wagner (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Andrew Swallow (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/09/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Paul Rubin (10/09/03)
David Wagner where are you? David A. Scott (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Paul Rubin (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Nudge (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David A. Scott (10/09/03)
Re: followup to SSL+LTC Mack (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Michael Amling (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? foo (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Storage based 3Des Password (Checksum) Michael Amling (10/09/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? David Wagner (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? wrong way philbin (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Tom St Denis (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? wrong way philbin (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Eugene Styer (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Eddy (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David A. Scott (10/09/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/09/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mok-Kong Shen (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Benjamin Choi (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Mok-Kong Shen (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" David A. Scott (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David A. Scott (10/09/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bob Silverman (10/09/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Peter Fairbrother (10/09/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Peter Fairbrother (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tanu R. (10/09/03)
followup to SSL+LTC Tom St Denis (10/09/03)
Re: deficiences of linear congruential RNGs Klaus Pommerening (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Tom St Denis (10/09/03)
Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Erwann ABALEA (10/09/03)
Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert" Benjamin Choi (10/09/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/09/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/09/03)
Re: deficiences of linear congruential RNGs Mok-Kong Shen (10/09/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Bill Unruh (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? wrong way philbin (10/09/03)
Re: deficiences of linear congruential RNGs Francois Grieu (10/09/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/09/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/09/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Douglas A. Gwyn (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/09/03)
Re: Encrypted software backups? TC (10/09/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Marcel Martin (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Gregory G Rose (10/09/03)
Encrypted software backups? TC (10/09/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet cascade (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Gregory G Rose (10/09/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Andrew Swallow (10/09/03)
Re: Storage based 3Des Password (Checksum) m_houllier (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Joe Peschel (10/09/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Andrew Swallow (10/09/03)
Re: deficiences of linear congruential RNGs Mack (10/09/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Mack (10/09/03)
Re: deficiences of linear congruential RNGs ross (10/09/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/09/03)
Re: deficiences of linear congruential RNGs Mack (10/08/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mack (10/08/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Gregory G Rose (10/08/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Roger Schlafly (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/08/03)
deficiences of linear congruential RNGs ross (10/08/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function John Hadstate (10/08/03)
CFP: ADVIS'2004 Advances in Information Systems ADVIS 2004 (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: Storage based 3Des Password (Checksum) Michael Amling (10/08/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Michael Amling (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? David Wagner (10/08/03)
Re: SSL Addition to LibTomCrypt Paul Rubin (10/08/03)
Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Michael Amling (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Michael Amling (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Erwann ABALEA (10/08/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David A. Scott (10/08/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) James Vanns (10/08/03)
Re: Storage based 3Des Password (Checksum) Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Storage based 3Des Password (Checksum) m_houllier (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Gregory G Rose (10/08/03)
SSL Addition to LibTomCrypt Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Gregory G Rose (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Nils Goesche (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/08/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/08/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: question about key generators macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/08/03)
Re: question about key generators G. Orme (10/08/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/08/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Grumble (10/08/03)
Re: question about key generators Haldir (10/08/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: question about key generators G. Orme (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Paul Rubin (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/08/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Douglas A. Gwyn (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/08/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/08/03)
Re: Where should I start, what should I ask? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/08/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/08/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Bryan Olson (10/08/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Gregory G Rose (10/08/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Tom St Denis (10/08/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Andrew Swallow (10/08/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/08/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Gregory G Rose (10/08/03)
Re: Execryptor Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/08/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/08/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Gregory G Rose (10/08/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/08/03)
Re: EFF Report on Trusted Computing Jan Panteltje (10/07/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Jim Gillogly (10/07/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Andrew Morgan (10/07/03)
Re: SHA-1 Test Vectors Jim Gillogly (10/07/03)
Re: EFF Report on Trusted Computing jsavard_at_ecn.ab.ca (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
SHA-1 Test Vectors Andrew Morgan (10/07/03)
Re: question about key generators Haldir (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Phil Carmody (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Stang (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Tom St Denis (10/07/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Tom St Denis (10/07/03)
Re: DSA Timing Tom St Denis (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Tom St Denis (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: Execryptor Venatyr (10/07/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? David Wagner (10/07/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Michael Amling (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: EFF Report on Trusted Computing Roger Schlafly (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Ernst Lippe (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/07/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/07/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lolo (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question lolo (10/07/03)
Re: Numeric one-way hash function Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
question about key generators G. Orme (10/07/03)
Numeric one-way hash function Mark Snelling (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: Enc(hash(message) || message) authenticated encryption Michael Amling (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Fernando (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Michael Amling (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Fernando (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Hack Bert (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Execryptor Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Lorenzo Bolognini (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) James Vanns (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Bill Unruh (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Bill Unruh (10/07/03)
Re: DSA Timing DJohn37050 (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography D. J. Bernstein (10/07/03)
Re: Crime and social change Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: Where should I start, what should I ask? Daniel Skinner (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: Crime and social change Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
[Newbie] Prime factorization question Lorenzo Bolognini (10/07/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/07/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic John E. Hadstate (10/07/03)
Re: Where should I start, what should I ask? Daniel Skinner (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Enc(hash(message) || message) authenticated encryption Ulrich Wurst (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Bill Unruh (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Enc(hash(message) || message) authenticated encryption Francois Grieu (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Bill Unruh (10/07/03)
Re: Execryptor Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Bill Unruh (10/07/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Execryptor Michael Brown (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Execryptor Gillian Seed (10/07/03)
Re: Block cipher security - deterministic systems problem John Eskie (10/07/03)
Re: Crime and social change Hank (10/07/03)
Enc(hash(message) || message) authenticated encryption Jogchem (10/07/03)
Re: how to read the math in RFCs? Ariel Shaqed (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/07/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? David Wagner (10/07/03)
Re: Execryptor Benjamin Choi (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Rob Marston (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Jim Gillogly (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? David Wagner (10/07/03)
Digital Signatures using Elliptic Curves John M. Dlugosz (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography David Wagner (10/07/03)
Re: Where should I start, what should I ask? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/07/03)
Re: Block cipher security - deterministic systems problem Douglas A. Gwyn (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: how to read the math in RFCs? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Jim Gillogly (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Douglas A. Gwyn (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/07/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/07/03)
EFF Report on Trusted Computing Nomen Nescio (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Scott Contini (10/07/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Scott Contini (10/07/03)
Re: a question about the Qaudratic Sieve lapin des pyrenees (10/07/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet cascade (10/07/03)
Re: Where should I start, what should I ask? Jim Gillogly (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Nicol So (10/07/03)
Re: a question about the Qaudratic Sieve lapin des pyrenees (10/07/03)
Re: a question about the Qaudratic Sieve Scott Contini (10/07/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/07/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/07/03)
DSA Timing flip (10/07/03)
Execryptor Gillian Seed (10/07/03)
Re: Where should I start, what should I ask? Jim Gillogly (10/07/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Phil Carmody (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Matthew Skala (10/07/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Phil Carmody (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Where should I start, what should I ask? Daniel Skinner (10/07/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Crime and social change Andrew Swallow (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: a question about the Qaudratic Sieve lapin des pyrenees (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/07/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Mok-Kong Shen (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Micah Cowan (10/06/03)
Re: a question about the Qaudratic Sieve Vedat Hallac (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Foo Bar (10/06/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Jim Gillogly (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: a question about the Qaudratic Sieve Phil Carmody (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Andrew Swallow (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Foo Bar (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (10/06/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Francois Grieu (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Mike Curry (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? D. J. Bernstein (10/06/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bill Unruh (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Bill Unruh (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bill Unruh (10/06/03)
Block cipher security - deterministic systems problem John Eskie (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bill Unruh (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bill Unruh (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bill Unruh (10/06/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography D. J. Bernstein (10/06/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Bob Silverman (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Phil Carmody (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Mok-Kong Shen (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Grumble (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: how to read the math in RFCs? Micah Cowan (10/06/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic John A. Malley (10/06/03)
Re: MegaSnakeOil Hank (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/06/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/06/03)
Re: Cryptanalysis with SAT solvers Francois Grieu (10/06/03)
Re: Bootstrapping Mok-Kong Shen (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic George Ou (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? George Ou (10/06/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/06/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Benjamin Choi (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic Douglas A. Gwyn (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/06/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Hank (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
lfsr bubba (10/06/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? - Off Topic John A. Malley (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Andrew Swallow (10/06/03)
a question about the Qaudratic Sieve lapin des pyrenees (10/06/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/06/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/06/03)
Re: how to read the math in RFCs? Scott Fluhrer (10/06/03)
Re: how to read the math in RFCs? Matthew Skala (10/06/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Bob Silverman (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? David Taylor (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Joe Peschel (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/06/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? David Taylor (10/06/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Vernon Schryver (10/06/03)
how to read the math in RFCs? R.Lillelien (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Bryan Olson (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nudge (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/05/03)
Re: Bootstrapping Tom St Denis (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/05/03)
Bootstrapping Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/05/03)
Re: Are numbers stations using OTPs? Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/05/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? David Magda (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Markus Jansson (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (10/05/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Simon Johnson (10/05/03)
Are numbers stations using OTPs? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: SP-network definition Tom St Denis (10/05/03)
Re: SP-network definition Simon Johnson (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? David Taylor (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/05/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Tom St Denis (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/05/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/05/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Benjamin Choi (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? David Taylor (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? David Taylor (10/05/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet macckone_at_a_nospamjunk123_ol.com (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Pilou (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Paul Schlyter (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lolo (10/05/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/05/03)
Re: New hash calculator Christian Faulhammer (10/05/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Bryan Olson (10/05/03)
Re: New hash calculator Dominik Reichl (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? George Ou (10/05/03)
Re: Semiramis not broken yet Pilou (10/05/03)
Re: decrypting request George P (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John A. Malley (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Jim Gillogly (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? John A. Malley (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Jim Gillogly (10/05/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/05/03)
Re: unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Brent White (10/05/03)
MegaSnakeOil Joe Peschel (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Jim Gillogly (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: The system used by AC and friends Mike Scott (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Dennis Knorr (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Jim Gillogly (10/05/03)
The system used by AC and friends pbs (10/05/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (10/05/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/05/03)
Semiramis not broken yet cascade (10/05/03)
Re: Cryptanalysis with SAT solvers David Wagner (10/05/03)
Re: controversial paper David Wagner (10/05/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (10/05/03)
Re: 3DES wireless keybd. Delia (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Pilou (10/04/03)
Re: New hash calculator Christian Faulhammer (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/04/03)
Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Kristian Olsen (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? harlequin (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/04/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/04/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today? Markus Jansson (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Richard Heathfield (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Sisyphus (10/04/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/04/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Kristian Olsen (10/04/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Ramon F Herrera (10/04/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John Schutkeker (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (10/04/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Ramon F Herrera (10/04/03)
Re: 3DES wireless keybd. John A. Malley (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/04/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Tom St Denis (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Randy Howard (10/04/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Tom St Denis (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lolo (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Dennis Knorr (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? harlequin (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Pilou (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? harlequin (10/04/03)
Re: 3DES wireless keybd. Michael Brown (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Richard Heathfield (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
New hash calculator Dominik Reichl (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Christian Faulhammer (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/04/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lolo (10/04/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Simon Johnson (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/04/03)
Re: 3DES wireless keybd. John A. Malley (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Simon Johnson (10/04/03)
Re: Livin' on the edge ...VMPC challenge Francois Grieu (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Richard Heathfield (10/04/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Benjamin Choi (10/04/03)
3DES wireless keybd. Delia (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Sisyphus (10/04/03)
Re: A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Joe Peschel (10/04/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Joe Peschel (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Benjamin Choi (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/04/03)
Re: Factoring with cubic equations? Bob Silverman (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Sander Vesik (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Dennis Ritchie (10/04/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/04/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Tom St Denis (10/04/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Benjamin Choi (10/04/03)
A solution looking for a problem (Vigenere Factors) Ramon F Herrera (10/04/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/04/03)
Factoring with cubic equations? lapin des pyrenees (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Nicol So (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (10/04/03)
Re: Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/04/03)
Re: controversial paper Phil Carmody (10/04/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/03/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/03/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Joe Peschel (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (10/03/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Joe Peschel (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John Myre (10/03/03)
Any recommended software for 3DES encryption? Kristian Olsen (10/03/03)
Re: decrypting request Joe Peschel (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Joe Peschel (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (10/03/03)
This Sux! Bush Beer (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics John A. Malley (10/03/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: to sig or not to sig? pbs (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Christian Faulhammer (10/03/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys John M. Dlugosz (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? John M. Dlugosz (10/03/03)
Re: HMAC vs DSA Francois Grieu (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
HMAC vs DSA John Hadstate (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Phil Carmody (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Phil Carmody (10/03/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? MacGregor K. Phillips (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Phil Carmody (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Phil Carmody (10/03/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Andrew Swallow (10/03/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Thomas Pornin (10/03/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Tom St Denis (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Andrew Swallow (10/03/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Thomas Pornin (10/03/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics DJohn37050 (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: A revised "FFT" hash function. Tom St Denis (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? David A. Scott (10/03/03)
Re: Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Tom St Denis (10/03/03)
Nonlinearity in block cipher round functions Benjamin Choi (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Grumble (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Lassi Hippel�inen (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Gregory G Rose (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Are natural languages secure ciphers? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/03/03)
Re: MD5 question Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Gregory G Rose (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: MD5 question Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/03/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Francois Grieu (10/03/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Gregory G Rose (10/03/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Ben Pfaff (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Joe Peschel (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Nicol So (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Nicol So (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/03/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Mailman (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (10/03/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Mok-Kong Shen (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? Gregory G Rose (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (10/03/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? davidw (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Douglas A. Gwyn (10/03/03)
Re: Livin' on the edge ...VMPC challenge Gelo Ilzi (10/03/03)
Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (10/03/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Andrew Swallow (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Francois Grieu (10/02/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? John Hadstate (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Howard (10/02/03)
Re: e-voting Jan Panteltje (10/02/03)
Re: Livin' on the edge ...VMPC challenge Bartosz Zoltak (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Paul Schlyter (10/02/03)
Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Joe Peschel (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics pleyland_at_microsoft.com (10/02/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Roger Schlafly (10/02/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Peter Fairbrother (10/02/03)
Re: Crypto Clubs Dave Smith (10/02/03)
Crypto Clubs John Schutkeker (10/02/03)
Re: e-voting Randy Howard (10/02/03)
Re: A revised "FFT" hash function. Tom St Denis (10/02/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Bill Unruh (10/02/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Francois Grieu (10/02/03)
Re: e-voting Mok-Kong Shen (10/02/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Michael Brown (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Mok-Kong Shen (10/02/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/02/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (10/02/03)
Re: IPv4 vs. IPv6 [was: Re: controversial paper ] Rob Warnock (10/02/03)
Re: Software Installation Keys Sasha (10/02/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Paul Schlyter (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Cryptanalysis with SAT solvers Francois Grieu (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/02/03)
Re: IPSec Question Ariel Shaqed (10/02/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Michael Brown (10/02/03)
Re: decrypting request Michael Brown (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Mok-Kong Shen (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Richard Heathfield (10/02/03)
Re: Livin' on the edge ...VMPC challenge Gelo Ilzi (10/02/03)
Re: IPSec Question Haitham Genedy (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Gregory G Rose (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Roger Schlafly (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Dennis Ritchie (10/02/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Michael Brown (10/02/03)
Re: Dan Brown's stuff is not science but, can you help? Brandon (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (10/02/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Bryan Olson (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Gregory G Rose (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Bryan Olson (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Joe Peschel (10/02/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (10/02/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (10/02/03)
Livin' on the edge ...VMPC challenge Bartosz Zoltak (10/02/03)
Livin' on the edge ...VMPC challenge Bartosz Zoltak (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Douglas A. Gwyn (10/02/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Peter Fairbrother (10/02/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Phil Carmody (10/02/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Peter Fairbrother (10/02/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Andrew Swallow (10/02/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/01/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Roger Schlafly (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Howard (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Richard Heathfield (10/01/03)
Re: Does quantum cryptography actually work? Peter Fairbrother (10/01/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Simon Johnson (10/01/03)
Re: MD5 question Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Jim Gillogly (10/01/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Tony T. Warnock (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John A. Malley (10/01/03)
Re: MD5 question Jim Gillogly (10/01/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Joe Peschel (10/01/03)
Re: controversial paper Anton Stiglic (10/01/03)
MD5 question Dan Johnson (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Joe Peschel (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Joe Peschel (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: controversial paper Anton Stiglic (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Gelo Ilzi (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request George P (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! ScottD (10/01/03)
Re: Long Vigenere Keys Jim Gillogly (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Ulrich Wurst (10/01/03)
Long Vigenere Keys John Schutkeker (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics pleyland_at_microsoft.com (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Howard (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Paul Rubin (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John Schutkeker (10/01/03)
unprovability of the security of computational cryptography Gelo Ilzi (10/01/03)
Re: Turing's Mathematics DJohn37050 (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John Schutkeker (10/01/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Grumble (10/01/03)
Turing's Mathematics John Schutkeker (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John Schutkeker (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (10/01/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Grumble (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Grumble (10/01/03)
Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Grumble (10/01/03)
Re: Beginner's Algorithm Michael Amling (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Grumble (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Mok-Kong Shen (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Stefan Seiffarth (10/01/03)
Re: Issue using encryption in Debug/Release mode ?? John Hadstate (10/01/03)
Re: NIST randomness-tests - EXE? Mok-Kong Shen (10/01/03)
Re: NIST randomness-tests - EXE? Bartosz Zoltak (10/01/03)
Re: Beginner's Algorithm Michael Amling (10/01/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! katiki_at_kodak.com (10/01/03)
Re: Security Criteria of Block Ciphers Klaus Pommerening (10/01/03)
Re: RSA security Michael Amling (10/01/03)
Re: Other good Crypto programs...? j0yst1ck (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Mxsmanic (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Mxsmanic (10/01/03)
Re: Beginner's Algorithm Will Dickson (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? RPK (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Grumble (10/01/03)
Re: THAT'S IT !! Andrew Swallow (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Tom St Denis (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Ulrich Wurst (10/01/03)
Re: IPSec Question Ariel Shaqed (10/01/03)
Re: IPv4 vs. IPv6 [was: Re: controversial paper ] Lassi Hippel�inen (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Mxsmanic (10/01/03)
Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Grumble (10/01/03)
THAT'S IT !! katiki_at_kodak.com (10/01/03)
Re: Issue using encryption in Debug/Release mode ?? Bruce Murray (10/01/03)
Re: e-voting Francois Grieu (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Mok-Kong Shen (10/01/03)
Re: Issue using encryption in Debug/Release mode ?? Brian Gladman (10/01/03)
Re: IPv4 vs. IPv6 [was: Re: controversial paper ] Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: e-voting Mok-Kong Shen (10/01/03)
Re: Issue using encryption in Debug/Release mode ?? katiki_at_kodak.com (10/01/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/01/03)
Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (10/01/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/01/03)
Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Marcel Martin (10/01/03)
IPv4 vs. IPv6 [was: Re: controversial paper ] Rob Warnock (10/01/03)
Re: Issue using encryption in Debug/Release mode ?? Gregory G Rose (10/01/03)
Re: e-voting Simon Johnson (10/01/03)
Issue using encryption in Debug/Release mode ?? katiki_at_kodak.com (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: IPSec Question Haitham Genedy (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Michael Brown (10/01/03)
Re: Beginner's Algorithm Gregory G Rose (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions John A. Malley (10/01/03)
Beginner's Algorithm Crown&7 (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Joe Peschel (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP tcne (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Len Norton (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP tcne (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP tcne (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP tcne (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP tcne (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Jim Gillogly (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Terry (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bryan Olson (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Gregory G Rose (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bob Silverman (10/01/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? MacGregor K. Phillips (10/01/03)
Re: controversial paper MacGregor K. Phillips (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Mxsmanic (10/01/03)
Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Craig Feinstein (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Mxsmanic (10/01/03)
Re: Rotor Machine Questions Jim Gillogly (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Terry (10/01/03)
Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (10/01/03)
Re: decrypting request Joe Peschel (09/30/03)
Re: ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? Christian Faulhammer (09/30/03)

Last message date: 10/31/03
Archived on: 10/31/03 CET

3092 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

sci.cryptBy Date

sci.crypt
By Date