Re: counter mode and data integrity
From: Joerg Platte (Joerg.Platte_at_uni-dortmund.de)
Date: 10/31/03
- Next message: G. Orme: "Re: Johnny Mnemonic"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key?"
- In reply to: Michael Amling: "Re: counter mode and data integrity"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: counter mode and data integrity"
- Reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: counter mode and data integrity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:51:08 +0100
Michael Amling wrote:
> If you're storing a hash-derived counter value, you may as well store
> a sequence-derived counter value.
> Your goal was "But I don't want to store the counter value for every
> block to save some bytes."
Yes. But to ensure data integrity I need a hash value. And if this value can
also be the counter it's possible to omit an additional counter.
Grüße,
Jörg
-- Dipl.-Ing. Jörg Platte Computer Engineering Institute | phone: +49 231-755-6165 University Dortmund | mobile: +49 178-2978865 44221 Dortmund / Germany | fax: +49 231-755-3251
- Next message: G. Orme: "Re: Johnny Mnemonic"
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: How long to break a 512 bit RSA key?"
- In reply to: Michael Amling: "Re: counter mode and data integrity"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: counter mode and data integrity"
- Reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: counter mode and data integrity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]