Re: manual cryptography

From: Jeff (frostback1963_at_yahooSANSSPAM.com)
Date: 10/30/03

  • Next message: Le Chaud Lapin: "Re: First Commercial Optical Processor" 
    Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:20:14 -0600

    "Neko" <neutral_insomniac@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:bnmp5m$12rc7p$1@ID-198243.news.uni-berlin.de...
    > What is the best paper and pencil method other than the one-time-pad of
    > encrypting a message without spending more than a minute per letter
    > encrypting?

    If you really don't want an OTP, or more correctly a pOTP, I'll suggest a
    book cipher. Keep in mind that if you transmit enough ciphertext, it should
    be possible to break it, but "enough" is an awful lot when working manually.

    Jeff

  • Next message: Le Chaud Lapin: "Re: First Commercial Optical Processor"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Stronger Encryption Methods
      ... | Schneier speaks of xoring an OTP with data and then encrypting the OTP ... | the block cipher and sending both the now encrypted OTP and the xored data ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: manual cryptography
      ... ]What is the best paper and pencil method other than the one-time-pad of ... ]encrypting a message without spending more than a minute per letter ... You could probably set up RC4 with a big square of 256 counters ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: manual cryptography
      ... > encrypting a message without spending more than a minute per letter ... constrained to manual cryptanalysis? ... "security through obscurity," like in the olden days (coding information ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: manual cryptography
      ... ]Neko writes: ... ]> encrypting a message without spending more than a minute per letter ... you have a way of breaking RC4 with computer, ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: manual cryptography
      ... > Neko wrote: ... >> encrypting a message without spending more than a minute per letter ... > Playfair followed by double transposition would be ...
      (sci.crypt)
    Loading