Re: manual cryptography
From: John Savard (jsavard_at_ecn.aSBLOKb.caNADA.invalid)
Date: 10/29/03
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Generators of cyclic group"
- Previous message: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: First Commercial Optical Processor"
- In reply to: John Hadstate: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Next in thread: John E. Hadstate: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Reply: John E. Hadstate: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:14:54 GMT
On 29 Oct 2003 08:55:37 -0800, jh113355@hotmail.com (John Hadstate)
wrote, in part:
>If you use 3 random letters for the key, he may
>have to try 17,576 combinations.
No, an autokey with a known alphabet can be solved rather more easily
than that - try the probable word method, for example.
John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Generators of cyclic group"
- Previous message: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: First Commercial Optical Processor"
- In reply to: John Hadstate: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Next in thread: John E. Hadstate: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Reply: John E. Hadstate: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]