Re: manual cryptography
From: John Savard (jsavard_at_ecn.aSBLOKb.caNADA.invalid)
Date: 10/29/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws?"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: manual cryptography"
- In reply to: Neko: "manual cryptography"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:52:35 GMT
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:04:36 +0100, Neko <neutral_insomniac@yahoo.com>
wrote, in part:
>What is the best paper and pencil method other than the one-time-pad of
>encrypting a message without spending more than a minute per letter
>encrypting?
I'm assuming that, since you want to avoid the one-time pad, you would
like to use a system that allows the key to be memorized.
Given that a cipher system is not considered secure unless it can
withstand an attack on the key alone, with the adversary knowing the
basic method, that runs into a problem right there, because memorizing
a key that is effectively 128 bits long is tricky.
One thing we also know is that it's easier for most people to perform
elaborate manipulations on numbers than it is on letters.
One possible idea is at
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/crypto/pp1324.htm
John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is it possible to devise a public-key cipher with no flaws?"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: manual cryptography"
- In reply to: Neko: "manual cryptography"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: manual cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]