Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine.
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/20/03
- Next message: wrong way philbin: "Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher""
- Previous message: Skybuck Flying: "Re: ECB security"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine."
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine."
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:08:46 +0200
Tom St Denis writes:
> See people, this is the exact bull*** I get angry about.
Perhaps you should first work on controlling your anger before flaming
people with whom you disagree.
> PGP was half-decent [bloatware if you ask me] and very
> "secure" for most tasks and it failed to get mass attention in
> terms of sales.
Mainly because, in the final analysis, bells and whistles sell a lot
better than security, even for security products.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: wrong way philbin: "Re: Schneier's "Helix" cipher is remarkably similar to the "generic feistel cipher""
- Previous message: Skybuck Flying: "Re: ECB security"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine."
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine."
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: New software featuring GEM 1024 bit encryption engine."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]