Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge
From: Markus Jansson (markus.jansson_at_hushmail.com)
Date: 10/18/03
- Previous message: Eris Pluvia: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- In reply to: George Ou: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Next in thread: George Ou: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Reply: George Ou: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:24:46 +0300
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:48:27 GMT, George Ou
<533george_ou234@netzero234.com> wrote:
> Usually, nothing will help you if there.
Yes. If you have whole HDD encrypted with preboot authentication (like
Safeboot Solo), then nobody cant install keyloggers onto the system.
-- My computer security & privacy related homepage http://www.markusjansson.net Use HushTools or GnuPG/PGP to encrypt any email before sending it to me to protect our privacy.
- Previous message: Eris Pluvia: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- In reply to: George Ou: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Next in thread: George Ou: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Reply: George Ou: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|