Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the
From: DJohn37050 (djohn37050_at_aol.com)
Date: 10/16/03
- Next message: cymelbird: "Re: The Passing of a Mathematician"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet"
- In reply to: Michael Amling: "Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function?"
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 16 Oct 2003 14:09:33 GMT
when doing things by bitwise concatenation of fields, prepending a zero makes
sure the payload to be encrypted is less than the modulus. It is just a way of
describing the way to make sure this is true. if you think of it as a number,
then the number is still the same value, but think of it as a bitstring.
Don Johnson
- Next message: cymelbird: "Re: The Passing of a Mathematician"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Controversial paper - Good response article on ZDNet"
- In reply to: Michael Amling: "Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function?"
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: why does PSS signature scheme put a "0" before the input to the RSA function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|