Re: "incrementing" ecb mode
From: David Wagner (daw_at_mozart.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 10/14/03
- Next message: Zack Best: "Re: vote fraud"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- In reply to: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- Next in thread: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- Reply: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>integrity is not that important
Are you sure? There are all too many examples where someone
designed a protocol with confidentiality protection but no integrity
protection, and where later attacks were discovered that breached
confidentiality by exploiting the lack of integrity. (I know, it sounds
hard to believe, when put this abstractly, but it's true.)
- Next message: Zack Best: "Re: vote fraud"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- In reply to: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- Next in thread: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- Reply: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: "incrementing" ecb mode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|