Re: Which algorithm would YOU choose for...

From: wrong way philbin (wwp_at_snaggle.com)
Date: 10/14/03


Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:39:29 -0700

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:58:03 -0400, "Douglas A. Gwyn"
<DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:

>wrong way philbin wrote:
>> <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:
>>>Simon Johnson wrote:
>>>>It is highly unlikely an attack that can actually decrypt your data with
>>>>a reasonable amount of resources will be discovered against Rijndael.
>>>That's a bit of an overstatement. No reasonable attack
>>>is generally known at present, but also there is as yet
>>>no proof that such an attack is forever impossible.
>> You appear to be overstating and and are thus incorrect. He never
>> approached "forever impossible" did he? No. Those are your words.
>> Johnson merely stated that an attack on Rijndael, using a reasonable
>> amount of resources, which would result in actual decryption of the
>> data, is highly unlikely.
>> Not impossible. Not forever impossible. But highly unlikely.
>
>Are you being intentionally dense? When Simon said that
>it is highly unlikely that an attack will be discovered,
>he didn't put any time limit on it. The history of
>cryptology suggests that if enough expert attention is
>directed at a system for long enough, successful attacks
>are highly likely to be discovered.
>I didn't say that Simon said anything about impossibility.
>That was part of my brief argument to the effect that
>there is no evidence to suggest that the historical trend
>must not hold for AES.

I don't care if you can't deal with it and want to call me being
intentionally dense.

My words stand and my words hold. And so do Johnson's.

AES is a modern cryptosystem brought to bear under a lot of scrutiny
and it is highly unlikely that a break resulting in decryption of data
will occur.

If you want to continue to argue differently, then you can,
incorrectly, continue to argue differently.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quadruple Algorithms
    ... occurring" (a fatal flaw being found in AES, ... the most likely attack on your entire system, ... Threat one: Your implementation of AES has an undiscovered ... with the output of one cipher feeding ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Only people who originally frequent sci.crypt reply to this
    ... The mode of a cipher is one of the many, ... you need to get right in order to turn a secure algorithm into a secure ... there are no known attacks against AES. ... attack of any kind against a cipher, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Quadruple Algorithms
    ... occurring" (a fatal flaw being found in AES, ... the most likely attack on your entire system, ...  So inverting ... For every low number multiplication as above divid the whole array by ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Quadruple Algorithms
    ... occurring" (a fatal flaw being found in AES, ... the most likely attack on your entire system, ... Threat one: Your implementation of AES has an undiscovered ... with the output of one cipher feeding ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: My little something...
    ... So where DES and FEAL, or even Knufu for that matter. ... been applied to a wide variety of ciphers from balanced feistels [DES, ... There is no reason to assume a future attack would apply only to AES. ...
    (sci.crypt)