Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question
From: Marcel Martin (mm_at_ellipsa.no.spam.net)
Date: 10/11/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today?"
- Previous message: John A. Malley: "Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert""
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question"
- Next in thread: Bob Silverman: "Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:35:38 +0200
Mxsmanic a écrit :
>
> Marcel Martin writes:
>
> > No, it works (p^e)^d = p^(ed) = p mod pq
> >
> > but you are right that there is a problem:
> >
> > p^(ed-1) = x mod pq with x <> 1 because the equation implies that x
> > must be a multiple of p.
> > You can check that p*p^(ed-1) = px = p^2 a = p mod pq
>
> What are the practical consequences of this in a cryptosystem?
None. I suppose that the RSA designers know since the beginning that
their algorithm works over a ring and not over a field :-)
MM
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: What (if any) mechanical crypto is safe today?"
- Previous message: John A. Malley: "Re: Evaluation of MegaSnakeOil by "expert""
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question"
- Next in thread: Bob Silverman: "Re: [Newbie] Prime factorization question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]