Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?
From: Paul Schlyter (pausch_at_saaf.se)
Date: 10/05/03
- Previous message: Paul Schlyter: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Next in thread: Christian Faulhammer: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
In article <3elunvss8d8j5bbt6rtk7sr57vcb1tkaad@4ax.com>,
Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Christian Faulhammer writes:
>
>> You need a lot of context to break language. If you don't have it, it
>> is really hard if you cannot find a base where it belongs to (all Roman
>> languages are very similar, so you can use Italian to understand
>> Spanish). In encryption normally context is given.
>
> Can you give an example of context that would allow an unknown natural
> language to be "cracked"?
The Rosetta stone allowed the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs to be
"cracked". This was really a known plaintext "attack".
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/ http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/
- Previous message: Paul Schlyter: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Next in thread: Christian Faulhammer: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|