Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?
From: Christian Faulhammer (usenet.jojo.1.leder_at_spamgourmet.com)
Date: 10/04/03
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Is MD5 outdated ?"
- Previous message: Christian Faulhammer: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 04 Oct 2003 21:24:00 +0200
Tach Mxsmanic, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Mxsmanic schrieb:
> Why haven't the codebreakers revealed how an Inca quipu works?
You need a lot of context to break language. If you don't have it, it
is really hard if you cannot find a base where it belongs to (all Roman
languages are very similar, so you can use Italian to understand
Spanish). In encryption normally context is given.
V-Li
-- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 http://www.gnupg.org
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Is MD5 outdated ?"
- Previous message: Christian Faulhammer: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading