Re: A revised "FFT" hash function.
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 10/03/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is MD5 outdated ?"
- Previous message: David A. Scott: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: A revised "FFT" hash function."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:27:56 GMT
I've revised the "design" yet again [disclaimer still applies] to improve
the sbox.
Changes
1. I use a different mixing network for the sbox. It has a comparable
delay but gives much better results [3 round feistel was almost always with
a NonLinearOrder [NLO] of 5 not 7]
2. The delta [DPmax] is now 8/256 not 16/256.
3. The lambda [LPmax] is not 30/256 not 32/256 [not a huge change :-(]
4. The NLO is now 7 not 5.
I've also lowered the round count to 10 because I strongly disbelieve that a
DC/LC attack could make it through 10 rounds [the best possible
[theoretical] 8 round approx would have in excess of 2^240 work]
Mads has expressed interest in "papering" up the design [I wrote it for him
originally anyways]. So hopefully he/we'll have a formal presentation up.
Tom
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Is MD5 outdated ?"
- Previous message: David A. Scott: "Re: Are natural languages secure ciphers?"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: A revised "FFT" hash function."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|