sci.crypt
By Date

2695 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

---

Starting: 08/31/03
Ending: 09/30/03

• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: This is soooo kool! Phil Carmody (09/30/03)
• RSA security Leif (09/30/03)
• e-voting Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (09/30/03)
• Re: This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (09/30/03)
• Re: This is soooo kool! Len Norton (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Craig Feinstein (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• ...before Radix-64 layer and Compression Algorithms? RPK (09/30/03)
• Re: NIST randomness-tests - EXE? Cristiano (09/30/03)
• Security Criteria of Block Ciphers Asif (09/30/03)
• Re: This is soooo kool! Tom St Denis (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bill Unruh (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper MacGregor K. Phillips (09/30/03)
• Rotor Machine Questions John Schutkeker (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper MacGregor K. Phillips (09/30/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• This is soooo kool! Death to Smoochy (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper MacGregor K. Phillips (09/30/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Michael Amling (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper MacGregor K. Phillips (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/30/03)
• Re: XML Encryption Key Derivation Adam Berent (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bill Unruh (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Craig Feinstein (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper David Taylor (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper David Taylor (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (09/30/03)
• Re: A revised "FFT" hash function. Mads Rasmussen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Aatu Koskensilta (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bill Unruh (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• NIST randomness-tests - EXE? Bartosz Zoltak (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/30/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Cypher (09/30/03)
• Re: decrypting request Marc Heusser (09/30/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Louis Scheffer (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper wrong way philbin (09/30/03)
• decrypting request George P (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Gregory G Rose (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Don Chiasson (09/30/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT David Eppstein (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP David Wagner (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• Re: Paper - impossible to prove P=?NP Craig Feinstein (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/30/03)
• A revised "FFT" hash function. Tom St Denis (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/30/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/30/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Jon Geier (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Richard Heathfield (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT David Wagner (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bryan Olson (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT David Eppstein (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT David Wagner (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Andrew Swallow (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login Brian Harnish (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Louis Scheffer (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Vernon Schryver (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: IPSec Question Ariel Shaqed (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Stephens (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (09/29/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Eugene Kuleshov (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/29/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/29/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? pleyland_at_microsoft.com (09/29/03)
• Re: WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing Panu Hämäläinen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Sam Simpson (09/29/03)
• Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys Bill Unruh (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ariel Shaqed (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tim Smith (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/29/03)
• Re: Verisign Managed PKI - API available? Christian Friedl (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tim Smith (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Aatu Koskensilta (09/29/03)
• Crypto Mini-FAQ Roger Schlafly (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Bruce Palmer (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Lou Scheffer (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Sisyphus (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul J Gans (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Vernon Schryver (09/29/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT David Wagner (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Andrew Swallow (09/29/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? Bruce Palmer (09/29/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? sqrt\(i\) (09/29/03)
• Re: Erasing a DVD-/+RW DISC Jan Panteltje (09/29/03)
• Re: Fast primecounting implementation flip (09/29/03)
• Book Review - Cryptography Decrypted: A Pictorial Introduction to Digital Security Lord Shaolin (09/29/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: factoring using geomerty? Bob Silverman (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/29/03)
• factoring using geomerty? sqrt\(i\) (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Sam Simpson (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper Don Chiasson (09/29/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: Questions -Factoring Aubrey Hutchison (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Andrew Swallow (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (09/28/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Paul Rubin (09/28/03)
• Re: Book as the key Andrew Swallow (09/28/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d David Wagner (09/28/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT David Wagner (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d David Wagner (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/28/03)
• Re: Questions -Factoring M.S. Bob (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper John A. Malley (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Cypher (09/28/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT Francois Grieu (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Cypher (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/28/03)
• Re: Questions -Factoring Aubrey Hutchison (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Cypher (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Gaussian-Elimination-Resistant (GER) Semirings Jim Steuert (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: Erasing a DVD-/+RW DISC David Carmichael (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Michael Amling (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: Erasing a DVD-/+RW DISC Jan Panteltje (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• A math link Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: Release 1.3 of my AES implementation Russ Lyttle (09/28/03)
• Re: compilation of ms crypto api program Russ Lyttle (09/28/03)
• Re: Questions -Factoring Bob Silverman (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Cristiano (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Questions -Factoring Aubrey Hutchison (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Aubrey Hutchison (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Cristiano (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again wrong way philbin (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys Roger Schlafly (09/28/03)
• Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys Gregory G Rose (09/28/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vesa (09/28/03)
• Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys TC (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Jim Gillogly (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys TC (09/28/03)
• Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys Gregory G Rose (09/28/03)
• IPSec Question Haitham Genedy (09/28/03)
• RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys TC (09/28/03)
• Re: F-functions for Feistel block ciphers Benjamin Choi (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Rickey Braddam (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: Book as the key Matthew Skala (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: Book as the key Matthew Skala (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test chenshaw (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper John A. Malley (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/28/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Scott Fluhrer (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/28/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Gregory G Rose (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Sam Simpson (09/28/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Mok-Kong Shen (09/28/03)
• Re: controversial paper Jim Gillogly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: F-functions for Feistel block ciphers Gregory G Rose (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Andrew Swallow (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Bryan Olson (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Michael Amling (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Arthur J. O'Dwyer (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Schlyter (09/27/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Michael Amling (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Paul Rubin (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Colin Andrew Percival (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vesa (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vesa (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/27/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper kurt wismer (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper kurt wismer (09/27/03)
• Re: F-functions for Feistel block ciphers Benjamin Choi (09/27/03)
• Re: F-functions for Feistel block ciphers Benjamin Choi (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper sqrt\(i\) (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper sqrt\(i\) (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Ernst Lippe (09/27/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Ernst Lippe (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• SecurID - 8-digit codes? Philip Pemberton (09/27/03)
• SecurID - 8-digit codes? Philip Pemberton (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: DriveCrypt Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: DriveCrypt Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Cristiano (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Cristiano (09/27/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Cristiano (09/27/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Cristiano (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mack (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login chenshaw (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login chenshaw (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Mok-Kong Shen (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key John M. Dlugosz (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key John M. Dlugosz (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login Colin Andrew Percival (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login Colin Andrew Percival (09/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge John M. Dlugosz (09/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge John M. Dlugosz (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge John M. Dlugosz (09/27/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge John M. Dlugosz (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login M.S. Bob (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login M.S. Bob (09/27/03)
• Re: F-functions for Feistel block ciphers Benjamin Choi (09/27/03)
• Re: F-functions for Feistel block ciphers Benjamin Choi (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing George Ou (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing Douglas A. Gwyn (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper David Taylor (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper David Taylor (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login Paul Rubin (09/27/03)
• Re: Human-answerable challenge response login Paul Rubin (09/27/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (09/27/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Michael Amling (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Roger Schlafly (09/27/03)
• Human-answerable challenge response login chenshaw (09/27/03)
• Human-answerable challenge response login chenshaw (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper sqrt\(i\) (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper sqrt\(i\) (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Elliott Roper (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Elliott Roper (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Colin Andrew Percival (09/27/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Colin Andrew Percival (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper kurt wismer (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper kurt wismer (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper David A. Scott (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper David A. Scott (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ernst Lippe (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ernst Lippe (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• Re: controversial paper Tom St Denis (09/27/03)
• controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• controversial paper Ben Mord (09/27/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step.... Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step.... Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Douglas A. Gwyn (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Joe Peschel (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Joe Peschel (09/26/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Ernst Lippe (09/26/03)
• Re: Diehard's Overlapping Sum Test Ernst Lippe (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mike Curry (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mike Curry (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mike Curry (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mike Curry (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mike Curry (09/26/03)
• Re: Looking for a cryptographers advise Mike Curry (09/26/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Ernst Lippe (09/26/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Ernst Lippe (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Juergen Helbing (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Juergen Helbing (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/26/03)
• Looking for a cryptographers advise Eugene Kuleshov (09/26/03)
• Looking for a cryptographers advise Eugene Kuleshov (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Mok-Kong Shen (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Colin Andrew Percival (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Colin Andrew Percival (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: WARNING do not use your real email address in USENET postings! Swem/Gibe virus will spam you 1000x! drumstik (09/26/03)
• Re: WARNING do not use your real email address in USENET postings! Swem/Gibe virus will spam you 1000x! drumstik (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: RSA modulus from e and d Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Eugene Styer (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Eugene Styer (09/26/03)
• RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• RSA modulus from e and d Santa Claus (09/26/03)
• Re: more AES? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: more AES? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: more AES? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: more AES? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing Panu Hämäläinen (09/26/03)
• WLAN security article in IEEE Internet Computing Panu Hämäläinen (09/26/03)
• Re: WARNING do not use your real email address in USENET postings! Swem/Gibe virus will spam you 1000x! Donald Hines (09/26/03)
• Re: WARNING do not use your real email address in USENET postings! Swem/Gibe virus will spam you 1000x! Donald Hines (09/26/03)
• Re: X9.31 standard status DJohn37050 (09/26/03)
• Re: X9.31 standard status DJohn37050 (09/26/03)
• more AES? junaid (09/26/03)
• more AES? junaid (09/26/03)
• MacOS X "Panther" File Vault Louis Granboulan (09/26/03)
• MacOS X "Panther" File Vault Louis Granboulan (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step... M.S. Bob (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step... M.S. Bob (09/26/03)
• Re: Can RSA and DSA combined in a hierarchy? Francois Grieu (09/26/03)
• Re: Can RSA and DSA combined in a hierarchy? Francois Grieu (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/26/03)
• Re: WARNING do not use your real email address in USENET postings! Swem/Gibe virus will spam you 1000x! Grumble (09/26/03)
• Re: WARNING do not use your real email address in USENET postings! Swem/Gibe virus will spam you 1000x! Grumble (09/26/03)
• X9.31 standard status Pedro Felix (09/26/03)
• X9.31 standard status Pedro Felix (09/26/03)
• Re: A stupid text trick - Example of the redundancy of English text Mok-Kong Shen (09/26/03)
• Re: A stupid text trick - Example of the redundancy of English text Mok-Kong Shen (09/26/03)
• Re: Can RSA and DSA combined in a hierarchy? Selkin (09/26/03)
• Re: Can RSA and DSA combined in a hierarchy? Selkin (09/26/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Mack (09/26/03)
• Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge Mack (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vempu (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vempu (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step... Nisarg Sutaria (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step... Nisarg Sutaria (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Juergen Helbing (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Juergen Helbing (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step.... Nisarg Sutaria (09/26/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step.... Nisarg Sutaria (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Juergen Helbing (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Juergen Helbing (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vempu (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Vempu (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Scott Fluhrer (09/26/03)
• Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Scott Fluhrer (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Gregory G Rose (09/26/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Gregory G Rose (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Michael Amling (09/26/03)
• Re: Book as the key Michael Amling (09/26/03)
• LibTomCrypt [v0.91] released and bug found in LibTomMath Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• LibTomCrypt [v0.91] released and bug found in LibTomMath Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! Nicol So (09/26/03)
• Re: Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! Nicol So (09/26/03)
• Re: Remark on use of CTR mode of AES Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Re: Remark on use of CTR mode of AES Tom St Denis (09/26/03)
• Remark on use of CTR mode of AES Mok-Kong Shen (09/26/03)
• Remark on use of CTR mode of AES Mok-Kong Shen (09/26/03)
• Re: AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) Scott Contini (09/26/03)
• Re: AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) Scott Contini (09/26/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Francois Grieu (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Francois Grieu (09/25/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Mok-Kong Shen (09/25/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Mok-Kong Shen (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Joe Peschel (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Joe Peschel (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption David Wagner (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption David Wagner (09/25/03)
• Re: AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) Nils Goesche (09/25/03)
• Re: AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) Nils Goesche (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Paul Rubin (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Paul Rubin (09/25/03)
• Re: AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) Brian Gladman (09/25/03)
• Re: AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) Brian Gladman (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Francois Grieu (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Francois Grieu (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Roger Schlafly (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Roger Schlafly (09/25/03)
• Re: Magic Flight: latest version of a public-key algorithm using max-plus algebra Jim Steuert (09/25/03)
• Re: Magic Flight: latest version of a public-key algorithm using max-plus algebra Jim Steuert (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Paul Sheer (09/25/03)
• Re: Questioning risks of using the same key for authentication and encryption Paul Sheer (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step.... Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: After finishing the first step.... Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: Strange encryption issues using AES algorithm... Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: Strange encryption issues using AES algorithm... Douglas A. Gwyn (09/25/03)
• Re: crypto lib for Java ? Whitefire (09/25/03)
• Re: crypto lib for Java ? Whitefire (09/25/03)
• Re: crypto lib for Java ? clem (09/25/03)
• Re: crypto lib for Java ? clem (09/25/03)
• Re: Book as the key aditya (09/25/03)
• Re: Book as the key aditya (09/25/03)
• Verisign Managed PKI - API available? Lijiv Khil (09/25/03)
• Verisign Managed PKI - API available? Lijiv Khil (09/25/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT DJohn37050 (09/25/03)
• Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT DJohn37050 (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Paul Rubin (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Paul Rubin (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Paul Rubin (09/25/03)
• Re: Strange encryption issues using AES algorithm... David A. Scott (09/25/03)
• Re: Strange encryption issues using AES algorithm... David A. Scott (09/25/03)
• AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) jools (09/25/03)
• AES s-box in GF(16) opposed to GF(256) jools (09/25/03)
• Re: Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Book as the key Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• Re: Is MD5 outdated ? Mxsmanic (09/25/03)
• VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/25/03)
• VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses? Bartosz Zoltak (09/25/03)
• Re: crypto lib for Java ? Volker Hetzer (09/25/03)
• Re: crypto lib for Java ? Volker Hetzer (09/25/03)
• Re: Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! Brian Gladman (09/25/03)
• Re: Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! Brian Gladman (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Simon Johnson (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Simon Johnson (09/25/03)
• Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! katiki_at_kodak.com (09/25/03)
• Same AES encrypted files on 2 different machine, different results ! katiki_at_kodak.com (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Simon Johnson (09/25/03)
• Re: Has anyone really cracked anything recently? Simon Johnson (09/25/03)
• After finishing the first step.... Nisarg Sutaria (09/25/03)
• After finishing the first step.... Nisarg Sutaria (09/25/03)