Re: This is soooo kool!
From: Death to Smoochy (FoneBone_at_Snerd.Blort)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Death to Smoochy: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- Previous message: Len Norton: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- Next in thread: Len Norton: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:05:28 GMT
"Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@iahu.ca> wrote in
news:lvieb.15270$lKj.14415@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com:
> Blah blah blah.
I don't see you cracking serial numbers with the methods of formal
cryptography.
> The codes aren't meant to be uber-hard to crack they're meant to be a
> roadblock so you have to explicitly work against it to run the
> software. E.g. you cannot claim it was "free" or whatnot because you
> had to use a keygen.
I didn't say they were. This is an interesting case history of how to
extract an algorithm with nothing more than a front panel attack, with no
reverse engineering required. You can't do it.
- Next message: Death to Smoochy: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- Previous message: Len Norton: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- Next in thread: Len Norton: "Re: This is soooo kool!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|