Re: controversial paper
From: MacGregor K. Phillips (mkp_at_topsecretcrypto.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: George Ou: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:20:36 +0800
"Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1tqfnv0i8a4ebh21s1cepg3fv6hv7v90gi@4ax.com...
> Ben Mord writes:
>
> > As for the rest, I'm glad you've come around to my assertion that the IT
> > industry is not operating very efficiently.
>
> It does not operate efficiently because it has never been forced to. IT
> has been a fairyland of high margins and low productivity/quality for
> decades, more or less since its birth. But those days will eventually
> draw to a close, just as they have for so many other industries.
>
> Intel needs to enjoy its 95% margins on new microprocessors while it
> can.
What is wrong with 95% margins, if in fact that is what they get. The
processing power you have in your $1,000.00 computer today would have cost
you many millions of dollars just 25 years ago. Keep it up, Intel.
MacGregor K. Phillips
- Next message: George Ou: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|