Re: controversial paper
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Bartosz Zoltak: "Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses?"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:15:01 +0200
Mok-Kong Shen writes:
> The mentioned groups are indeed the right groups for
> your idea, evidently. If your idea is found to be right
> there, you could even have a good chance of patenting it
> thus earning a sum, I would guess. So do try to post there
> your idea and eventually report back to us your triumph.
It will not be adopted, and I'm not interested in patents.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Bartosz Zoltak: "Re: VMPC Stream Cipher - ideas on potential weaknesses?"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]