Re: controversial paper
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: pleyland_at_microsoft.com: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:59:17 +0200
Mxsmanic wrote:
>
> Bryan Olson writes:
> > ... but be careful about posting the same naive
> > proclamations to the comp.protocols groups.
>
> Do I risk reading the same types of replies? If so, I can handle that
> without any difficulty.
The mentioned groups are indeed the right groups for
your idea, evidently. If your idea is found to be right
there, you could even have a good chance of patenting it
thus earning a sum, I would guess. So do try to post there
your idea and eventually report back to us your triumph.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: pleyland_at_microsoft.com: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]