Re: controversial paper
From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress_at_nowhere.org)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Rickey Braddam: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:41:32 GMT
Mxsmanic wrote:
> Bryan Olson writes:
>
>>At least get the reserved-field rule right: the writer must set
>>to zero; the reader must ignore.
>
> Since the only way to make a field zero is to write to it, this is
> implicit in my descriptions.
Sure. You got half-credit.
-- --Bryan firstname dot lastname at domain of the Association for Computing Machinery
- Next message: Rickey Braddam: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]