Re: controversial paper
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Bryan Olson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 03:30:21 +0200
Bryan Olson writes:
> At least get the reserved-field rule right: the writer must set
> to zero; the reader must ignore.
Since the only way to make a field zero is to write to it, this is
implicit in my descriptions.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- In reply to: Bryan Olson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]