Re: controversial paper
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: David Eppstein: "Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT"
- In reply to: Don Chiasson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:55:12 GMT
"Don Chiasson" <don_chiasson@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:gq4eb.4842$lKj.1577@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> There is a problem with this (admittedly simplified) model: it is not an
> instantaneous code[1].
Also known as a prefix condition [ala Huffman].
Tom
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: David Eppstein: "Re: Factoring vs 3-SAT"
- In reply to: Don Chiasson: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]