Re: factoring using geomerty?
From: sqrt\(i\) (com.com_at_com)
Date: 09/29/03
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Previous message: Bruce Palmer: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- In reply to: Bob Silverman: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Next in thread: pleyland_at_microsoft.com: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Reply: pleyland_at_microsoft.com: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:41:11 -0400
would you care to elaborate just a little on the link between the difference
of squares and its relation to geometry?
thanks
mitou
"Bob Silverman" <pubkeybreaker@aol.comstuff> wrote in message
news:20030928184243.02978.00000273@mb-m26.aol.com...
> Hi,
>
> May I suggest that you get a book on this
> subject? Your question is "too wide open"
> in general to give a meaningful answer,
> but generally the answer is "yes".
>
> The Elliptic Curve Method definitely relies
> on geometry, as does the difference of
> squares. Even sieve methods rely to some
> part on "geometry".
>
> As to what kind of geometry, I don't want
> to be condenscending, but the wording of
> your question suggests that you would
> not understand a meaningful answer.
> Would the answer "algebraic geometry"
> mean anything to you?
> You can lead a horse's ass to knowledge, but you can't make him think.
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Previous message: Bruce Palmer: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- In reply to: Bob Silverman: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Next in thread: pleyland_at_microsoft.com: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Reply: pleyland_at_microsoft.com: "Re: factoring using geomerty?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|