Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: TC: "Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: wrong way philbin: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: wrong way philbin: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:49:48 +0200
Douglas A. Gwyn writes:
> Decades of concentration in this field have produced capabilities
> that have not been duplicated elsewhere.
Maybe, maybe not.
> No corporate entity has invested even a significant fraction
> of the annual effort on cryptology that the Agency has, so they
> are not likely to even come close to catching up.
It's not a question of brute effort, it's a question of brains.
> The only force I know of that could change that would
> be sustained mismanagement within the Agency, which would
> have the potential to destroy accrued capabilities and
> prevent the emergence of others.
Hmm.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: TC: "Re: RC4 encrypt/decrypt keys"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: wrong way philbin: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: wrong way philbin: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]