Re: controversial paper
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/27/03
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test"
- In reply to: Ernst Lippe: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: kurt wismer: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:24:33 +0200
Ernst Lippe writes:
> No. The main thesis of the paper is that a monoculture is bad for
> security, because the majority of the systems will share the same
> vulnerabilities.
I don't see any reason to believe that a single OS is any more or less
vulnerable than a multitude of operating systems. Security depends on
the operating system itself and how it is maintained and used.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: [Diehard] Overlap sum test"
- In reply to: Ernst Lippe: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: kurt wismer: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|