Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/27/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Philip Pemberton: "SecurID - 8-digit codes?"
- In reply to: Mack: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:33:54 +0200
Mack writes:
> Hmmm I wonder ... since I am in business to
> sell cryptography products and Meganet has
> damaged me by false advertising claims
>
> does anyone have the number of a good
> lawyer that likes to make judges laugh?
Be sure you find a judge who understands crypto, or the laughs might not
be in your favor.
Also, it would be hard to show real damages, I think.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: Philip Pemberton: "SecurID - 8-digit codes?"
- In reply to: Mack: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]