Re: controversial paper

From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 09/27/03


Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:30:16 GMT


"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote in message
news:W-2cnctwdZARguiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
> Roger Schlafly wrote:
> > Should we stop using TCP/IP and use diverse networks instead,
> > in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse?
>
> Actually, you sure as hell should stop using IPv4.

Why? The "we're running out of IPs" thing is actually just plain wrong.
That being said Roger didn't say v4 he said TCP/IP. I think he was alluding
to that we should also then use IPX and token rings and .... just in case
ethernet + TCP/IP gets buggered.

Tom



Relevant Pages

  • Re: controversial paper
    ... >> in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ... you sure as hell should stop using IPv4. ... That being said Roger didn't say v4 he said TCP/IP. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... >> in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ... you sure as hell should stop using IPv4. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... >> in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ... you sure as hell should stop using IPv4. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... > Should we stop using TCP/IP and use diverse networks instead, ... > in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... > Should we stop using TCP/IP and use diverse networks instead, ... > in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ...
    (sci.crypt)