Re: controversial paper
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 09/27/03
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: John M. Dlugosz: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- In reply to: kurt wismer: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Ben Mord: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Ben Mord: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Ben Mord: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Paul J Gans: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 06:06:15 GMT
(Previous message was cut off because of a Msft quirk. <g>)
The paper says:
The best estimates of the number of network connected
computers show an increase of 50% per year on a worldwide basis.
This seems high. Consumption of IP addresses is not nearly this high.
> far better, however, if the infrastructure as a whole has redundancies
> that are diverse in their technological nature so that a single
> vulnerability can't bring down everything...
Maybe, but the whole non-Msft world is settling on flavors of unix.
Everything from Apple Macs to IBM mainframes use one of the
unix clones. Where is the diversity?
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: controversial paper"
- Previous message: John M. Dlugosz: "Re: Security of Win2k or WinXP built in EFS - continued from Meganet challenge"
- In reply to: kurt wismer: "Re: controversial paper"
- Next in thread: Ben Mord: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Ben Mord: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Ben Mord: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: controversial paper"
- Reply: Paul J Gans: "Re: controversial paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
