Re: controversial paper

From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 09/27/03 

Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:26:43 -0400

Roger Schlafly wrote:
> Should we stop using TCP/IP and use diverse networks instead,
> in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse?

Actually, you sure as hell should stop using IPv4.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: controversial paper
    ... > Should we stop using TCP/IP and use diverse networks instead, ... > in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: firewalls and vulnerability to TCP/IP crash.
    ... I remember from many years ago, vaguely, something about TCP/IP stack ... today that can crash your system, ... firewalls, but you're usually at less risk with them than without them. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... >> in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ... you sure as hell should stop using IPv4. ... That being said Roger didn't say v4 he said TCP/IP. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... >> in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ... you sure as hell should stop using IPv4. ... That being said Roger didn't say v4 he said TCP/IP. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: controversial paper
    ... >> thereby making the potential collapse of our technological ... >> infrastructure much more feasible... ... >in order to cut the risk of a potential collapse? ... I would think that there is a difference between a standard ...
    (sci.crypt)