Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again

From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/19/03


Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:54:12 +0200

Michael Amling writes:

> It indicates that the software does not perform authentication.

Authentication of what?

> Authentication is good.

Maybe, maybe not. You might not want an adversary to be able to
determine whether a key is correct without examining the decrypted
result. Telling him if it is correct or not facilitates a key search.

-- 
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.


Relevant Pages

  • Re: NSA chooses ECC
    ... Michael Amling writes: ... The Cone of Silence. ... Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: CRC-32 and use as small hash
    ... Michael Amling wrote: ... > T Stoneman wrote: ... Using less security for authentication wouldn't make much sense. ...
    (sci.crypt)

Quantcast