Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 09/19/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Bob Silverman: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:11:08 GMT
"Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:shdkmvc9t768kjg7e6qdoids8943vlgcfa@4ax.com...
> Well, for one thing, people will take you seriously when you say it's no
> good.
Then I would waste all my time analyzing designs that are just very likely
to be pure crap.
> > They refer multiple times to "files" and rather large keys.
> > I'm programming for a device with say 256 bytes of ram
> > and an 8-bit processor.
>
> Perhaps they are not.
>
> > AES will work in that environment. Will VME?
>
> What difference does it make? They don't appear to be aiming at smart
> cards or similar devices. PCs have a lot more than 256 bytes of RAM.
Well AES scales well. That makes AES a better cipher than VME almost
immediately.
> > I'd suggest you go buy a dictionary.
>
> I'd suggest that you skip the personal attacks, unless you are trying to
> prove my point.
My point was "VME is crap" is an opinion not emotion. It's an opinion based
on past experiences.
Tom
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Previous message: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- In reply to: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Mxsmanic: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Bob Silverman: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|