Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/18/03
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Software based destruction of encrypted file(s)..."
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:28:40 +0200
Tom St Denis writes:
> The problem is science works the other way.
This isn't science, it's logic. If you know nothing about an algorithm,
you cannot say whether it is sound or unsound, period. You may wish to
assume that it is unsound by default, but that is your subjective
choice.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Software based destruction of encrypted file(s)..."
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading