Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again
From: David A. Scott (daVvid_a_scott_at_email.com)
Date: 09/17/03
- Next message: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Newbie question(s)..."
- Previous message: David A. Scott: "Re: Meganet's "unbreakable" cryptography? I'm skeptical."
- In reply to: Mike Curry: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Bruce Palmer: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 17 Sep 2003 12:32:45 GMT
"Mike Curry" <mcurry8173@rogers.com> wrote in
news:92Y9b.52612$DZ.13227@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com:
>
> I would start caring, if I were working at the US Dept of labor. What
> I mean is, they are grabbing certification and major customers now,
> more than ever... would you want to grab the money and rub it in their
> face?
>
>
You mean there are some that wouldn't?
David A. Scott
-- My Crypto code http://cryptography.org/cgi-bin/crypto.cgi/Misc/scott19u.zip http://cryptography.org/cgi-bin/crypto.cgi/Misc/scott16u.zip http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/ **TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" ** Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged. As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic system is only as strong as its weakest link"
- Next message: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Newbie question(s)..."
- Previous message: David A. Scott: "Re: Meganet's "unbreakable" cryptography? I'm skeptical."
- In reply to: Mike Curry: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Next in thread: Bruce Palmer: "Re: Meganet on Cryptogram again"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]