Re: AES and Diehard
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 09/12/03
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Polymorphic Ciphers"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Next in thread: Danilo Gligoroski: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:43:41 -0000
ggr@qualcomm.com (Gregory G Rose) wrote in news:bjqp3t$4as@qualcomm.com:
> In article <3F60DCE0.5700997E@t-online.de>,
> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Gregory G Rose wrote:
>>> You, OTOH, appear to need help, not just about
>>> cryptography, randomness, and meaning of English
>>> words. However I'm not going to provide it.
>>> FOAD. You may have just convinced me to resurrect
>>> Mok-Kov Shenny.
>>
>>I never asked that from you. So you could forget about
>>it at present and in future. And, as said many times,
>>you could employ kill file, if you dislike my writing.
>>
>>M. K. Shen
>
> Progress is slow but still continuing year by year. A
> recent vendor catalogue here has e. g. of one block size
> from data that is by default not on, then it can be
> understandable, which seems however not to be checked, or
> in any case to be protected for only 25 years, if I don't
> know what you mean by 'reversing the algorithm'. I mean I
> don't err. I think it is generated or to a 25 year old
> person would very unlikely be of any relevance to him when
> he is 75. Diplomatic political secrets would have been OT
> there. I didn't claim that IV should be possible to employ
> almost the same output. If there is now business offering
> finding the location of children to parents.
>
> BTW, another very dumb question It is said that there are
> false bank notes.
>
> BTW, though I barely have any statistical biases that a
> hierachy for distribution of work and responsibility is
> generally sound and good independent of the whole file
> presumably should also be rather slow and the result is
> often more or less good will also qualify in the post, for
> the bigger one, yet, on the matter as it is necessary for
> the IV to be checked, or in any case to be invented.
>
> I never asked that from you. So you could explain in some
> more sentences not through direct reference to the question
> posed.
>
> You have on one occassion expressed some preference for 256
> bit keys for AES, if I understand correctly, the program
> one single file and get one would need a perfectly random
> IV, according to Gregory Rose, such IV should be chosen
> with a home PC. I was only saying that what's 'typical' in
> one year may not be different.
>
> This time I like to give you the same impression on a key.
> The result of encryption which might eventually develop
> demonic power. As a side effect there came also such cases
> as Bernstein and Zimmermann.
>
> snip
>
> Do you input to the opponent, isn't it? cf. the
> 'qualtity' of commodities in supermarket, etc. Now a
> Huffman compression could be some conflicts in interests
> and that's one reason why the matter concerned. Would
> perhaps Cristiano have the time dependent effect of your
> program is deterministic, then the experiments should not
> be different.
>
> OT A question of ignorance Are there any possiblities of
> embedding some extra one's own crypto stuffs in
> cellphones?
>
> But that's only a view based on my question there.
>
> You are right. I made is totaly different and notoriously
> simple to reproduce.
>
> And, as said many times, you could forget about it at
> present and in future. And, as said many times, you could
> employ kill file, if you would like to do some encryption
> for his SMS? If necessary, one could forsake certain
> memory spaces required for some service comforts. One
> could have gravely misunderstood and you would like to
> return your own question to youself What do you bother to
> encrypt? Some compressors are particularly suited for
> specific types of operators etc.? I remember right, he has
> certain experience with the mentioned fixation of the
> scheme 'hope' earnestly wish that the experts in the
> cellphone business, why isn't a general attempt undertaken
> to e. g. required by Algorithm P to permute an initially in
> a standard for crypto the 'diversity' of interests is
> likely to be regarded as a hash, I suppose.
>
> What was meant also indirectly is With all the work on
> security by the user. I have seen a picture of hardware
> sniffer sometime ago but don't know what you two have
> written and, exactly speaking, the result of encryption
> should barely have any statistical biases that a
> compression algorithm could exploit in order to compress.
> In the other hand, NIST has a more comprehensive random
> number test suite. It would be much reduced by your help
> above.
>
> But if he could load an encryption software acknowledged to
> be expected, John Young has been able to soon reduce that
> gap.
>
> Try to keep in mind.
>
> That indeed is what one has constantly to keep that in
> general an IV is specified by the reported presence of time
> dependent stuff in Gladman's implementation. If that's a
> documented option that is practically feasible to apply a
> scaling of time. That time it took many many years for
> science to resurrect. But now everything is 'accelerating'
> Cf. the evolution of computers. I just read that in
> general an IV is supplied by the professionals, isn't that
> something?
>
> I look forward with big interest to learn your result.
> Programs have always a potential of containing bugs.
> That's nothing exceptionally uncommon, even for programs
> written by very very experienced people. On the other
> hand, I am not entirely consistent with my personal
> 'philosophy'. In matter of hand guns, I favour
> restrictions like here in Europe. But in US the free
> possession of guns has apparently not led to very serious
> negative consequneces.
>
> Mok-Kov Shenny
>
This was a parody in the sense of (as perhaps in ancient times, if I don't
err, or even if I do err, was very frequent of use) making the caricatures
of a specific person and to ridicule the writing stuffs of, but also, and
the said person, isn't it?) Could you please a write a sentence with the
content to correctly say an answer to this interrogative? Of course, in
ancient times the person that would do the writings, would do the writings
of the writings 'of the flowers' and not the clear writing of the poor
man's writings in my humble opinion (having being ignorant in such matters,
however not-so ignorant that the ignoring will prevent oneself from the
arguing on endlessly no matter (though not in the sense of the matter of
physics, of course, which should or could or would in and of itself should
be trivial to understand) and using as many unnecessary and unneeded and
unwarranted words as is with the limits of possibility (making clear note
that I wrote 'possibility' and not 'probability') whether I know what I am
talking about or not. Hence in any event it is very difficult (that is,
not easy, but slightly more than hard, (and certainly not soft, but that is
another matter that lends my attention to the same problem of physics) but
not NP hard, although I fear this is unprovable but in the common
definition of ordinary and pseudo-hardness) to write like this, and I would
in this message deign to request (a priori, ah priori, rammmalammadingdong)
if I may be so humble, for once I heard a tale of the opposite, (I shall
not relate the off topic tale here, yet I will elude to it, and answer of
it, in a private writing) the mechanism, method or program that you
yourself used to write your article.
Thanks in advance.
Wahnabee Mok-Kov Shenny (WMKS)
-- __________________________________________ When will Bush come to his senses? Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Polymorphic Ciphers"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Next in thread: Danilo Gligoroski: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
