Re: AES and Diehard
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 09/11/03
- Next message: Marc Heusser: "Re: AES-128 good enough for medical data?"
- Previous message: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- In reply to: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Next in thread: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Reply: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:16:59 +0200
"David A. Scott" wrote:
>
> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> > "David A. Scott" wrote:
> >>
> >> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > If you have carefully read the exchages, then I don't
> >> > understand what you are talking about.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Actually my careful reading of the exchanges should
> >> have little effect on your ability one way or the other
> >> to understand what is going on. But then again maybe this
> >> is over your head.
> >
> > You could have saved your time of posting such vague
> > or difficult to check/grasp comments.
> >
>
> True maybe.
Try to keep that in mind. Further do remember my advice,
given many times, of employing kill file for stuff that
you highly dislike.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Marc Heusser: "Re: AES-128 good enough for medical data?"
- Previous message: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- In reply to: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Next in thread: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Reply: David A. Scott: "Re: AES and Diehard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
