Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert
From: George Ou (533george_ou234_at_netzero234.com)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: George Ou: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- In reply to: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Next in thread: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Reply: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 01:12:34 GMT
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:06:00 GMT, dsr@Florence.edu wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:41:14 -0400 (EDT), "No One"
><no-one-no-spam@home.com> wrote:
>
>>OK. Here's the deal. I work for the government as a consultant on SIPRNET.
>>Had a discussion with a fellow contractor who works for a government agency
>>in Maryland. (Hint, Hint).
>>
>>He implied that RSA-type keys were inherently unsecure because of known
>>plaintext attacks. That is if I have your public key and use it to encrypt
>>one or more text messages (or I guess any other data), by knowing the
>>algorithm I can calculate the private key by comparing the cipherttext and
>>the know plaintext.
>>
>>I think there has to be more to the story. Unfortunately, my knowledge of
>>this encryption stops at knowing what group (i.e. this one) to ask the
>>question in.
>>
>>There has to be more to the story, right guys?? Probably involving
>>factoring very large prime numbers?
>>
>>I don't really need to know the answer to this question, but it will
>>provide an indication of how seriously I should take anything else this guy
>>says.
>>
>>Thanks
>
>Not everybody uses public key systems to encrypt plaintext. Some
>people use an RSA or Diffie Hellman scheme to exchange a random
>symmetric key. The random symmetric key is then used as a start key
>for a more robust symmetric key system. Although some of the more
>robust systems are not commercially available without screening I
>don't think they are completely unavailable.
No, PKC is almost never used to encrypt data. PGP mail, S/MIME, SSL,
EFS, and any other app I can think of all use PKC to protect the
symmetric session keys to kick start the symmetric crypto session.
George Ou
http://www.LANArchitect.net
- Previous message: George Ou: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- In reply to: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Next in thread: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Reply: dsr_at_Florence.edu: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|