Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert
From: Russ Lyttle (lyttlec_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 08/30/03
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: the FBI and 1 time pads"
- Previous message: castello: "ldap for certifcate"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 14:31:34 GMT
Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
> Russ Lyttle wrote:
>> OTOH, most key generators make pseudo-primes.
>
> Really? I would have thought that they would be tested
> before being used.
They are tested with a suite of standard tests. But the keys aren't
guaranteed to be prime, just probably prime or at least difficult to factor
composits. Which is why they are called pseudo-primes. Now if someone came
up with additional tests that could identify some composite pseudo-primes
that otherwise test ok, would that lead to the possibility of attacks
against those keyholders?
-- Russ Lyttle lyttlecatearthlink.net at = @
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: the FBI and 1 time pads"
- Previous message: castello: "ldap for certifcate"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: Interesting Discussion with US Government Computer Expert"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]