Re: Actually how simple is VMPC?
From: Mark Wooding (mdw_at_nsict.org)
Date: 08/29/03
- Next message: Cristiano: "Re: Factoring program"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Is triple DES in ECB mode secure?"
- In reply to: Bartosz Zoltak: "Actually how simple is VMPC?"
- Next in thread: Bartosz Zoltak: "Re: Actually how simple is VMPC?"
- Reply: Bartosz Zoltak: "Re: Actually how simple is VMPC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Aug 2003 19:54:55 GMT
Bartosz Zoltak <QPbzoltak@vmpcfunction.com> wrote:
> I would like to write false claims in the article [...]
You could start by saying that the moon was made from green cheese. (I
think you missed a `not'...)
> [...] in terms of simplicity.
That's a tricky area. What do you mean by `simple'?
I'd describe VMPC as a general construction like this.
Let n be a natural number, and let \kappa \in S_n be a cyclic
permutation on n objects. Define V: S_n -> S_n by
V(\pi) = \pi \kappa \pi^2
(Putting in arithmetic -- your `+ 1' -- actually makes the description
/more/ complicated because then we need to get involved with applying
permutations to some other set, probably Z/nZ, and it starts getting out
of hand. Maybe this is just because I'm no good at providing simple
descriptions of things.)
That's not too bad. But consider this description of a well-studied
one-way function.
Let p be a large prime, and let g generate a large prime-order
subgroup of (Z/pZ)^*. Define E: N -> Z/pZ by
E(n) = g^n
(I've copped out here by using integer discrete log specifically rather
than generalizing to other groups. I suppose I could have said `let p
be a prime and E be a nonsupersingular elliptic curve over Z/pZ...' but
that's starting to get messy already. Integers require less hedging. I
even managed to sneak in the requirement that (p - 1)/2 should have a
large prime factor.)
> which all can be also written with 3 MOV assembler instructions
I'd argue that this is more an efficiency thing than a simplicity
thing. You can do surprisingly complicated and weird things in a very
short program, if you try hard.
> Any indications on the simplest known one-way functions?
I'd offer discrete exponentiation as one. Also, squaring modulo a large
product of two primes. Hmm...
Let n be the product of two large primes; define R: Z/nZ -> Z/nZ by
R(x) = x^2
That's the simplest I've mentioned so far.
-- [mdw]
- Next message: Cristiano: "Re: Factoring program"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Is triple DES in ECB mode secure?"
- In reply to: Bartosz Zoltak: "Actually how simple is VMPC?"
- Next in thread: Bartosz Zoltak: "Re: Actually how simple is VMPC?"
- Reply: Bartosz Zoltak: "Re: Actually how simple is VMPC?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]