Re: RSA vs AES
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 08/29/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Previous message: Simon Johnson: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- In reply to: Waldyr: "RSA vs AES"
- Next in thread: LVB: "Re: RSA vs AES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:42:38 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Waldyr wrote:
| Hello !
|
| We know that symmetric algorithms are faster than assymmetric ones,
| for the same level of security. I'm interested to know if there is any
| reference where this difference is measured, I mean, about *how many
| times* AES-128, for example, is faster than RSA-1024, for the same
| plataform and the same volume of data.
Many. Nobody uses RSA to encrypt bulk data though. Normally you perform
a hybrid system.
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/T1hPsP+tEsHHY0ARApyXAJ4npgHJcUl5BpQQUAAn4dkw2H2lYgCgjQ4o
KumneRpR8XHCCsuRm1fs3+M=
=VAy+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Previous message: Simon Johnson: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- In reply to: Waldyr: "RSA vs AES"
- Next in thread: LVB: "Re: RSA vs AES"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|