Re: L14 Security Analysis
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 08/16/03
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: "Small" problem"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Obtaining variants of given s-boxes"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: L14 Security Analysis"
- Next in thread: TC: "Re: L14 Security Analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:44:43 +0000 (UTC)
Tom St Denis wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Richard Heathfield wrote:
> |>The word STUPID comes to mind...
> |
> |
> | Not really. It's just an observation to remember - don't say anything
> to Tom
> | in email that you wouldn't want replayed in public. Likewise, don't say
> | anything abusive, hostile, or threatening to /me/ in email that you
> | wouldn't want summarised in public. (I'm not suggesting that you
> would, of
> | course!)
>
> Fine we get it. You don't like me.
Not so. It's merely your sci.crypt posting behaviour that I don't like. When
you grow up a little, you'll be as likeable as you are competent[1], and
/that/ will be worth waiting for.
[1] I don't know, obviously, how competent Tom is, because his competence in
crypto far outweighs mine. I can deduce that he's not completely lame;
otherwise sci.crypt would just laugh at /everything/ he says, which they
don't.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: "Small" problem"
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Obtaining variants of given s-boxes"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: L14 Security Analysis"
- Next in thread: TC: "Re: L14 Security Analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
