Re: Is RC4 a good choice?
From: David Wagner (daw_at_mozart.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 08/05/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Previous message: Thor Russell: "reversible whole number license key"
- In reply to: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Reply: cardigan: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Reply: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Mrsjunecarey wrote:
>Well, frankly, you are coming across as somewhat patronizing.
That may well be. Not to mention blunt ... and tactless, too -- don't
forget tactless. Nonetheless, I still think my comments are accurate.
But maybe I'm wrong. Frankly, I'd rather be wrong. If there is some
convincing analysis to support the security of Leopard, I'd welcome it.
Would you be willing to post it here? Then we can get to discussing the
technical details.
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Previous message: Thor Russell: "reversible whole number license key"
- In reply to: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Reply: cardigan: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Reply: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: Is RC4 a good choice?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]