Re: [OT: This is not the thread you're looking for. You can goabout your business. Move along, move along.]
From: clem (clem_at_numeral.com)
Date: 07/25/03
- Next message: Peter Gutmann: "Re: why persist PKCS#7 CRL in embedded file sigs?"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: ActiveX Encryption"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: [OT: This is not the thread you're looking for. You can goabout your business. Move along, move along.]"
- Next in thread: John E. Hadstate: "Re: [OT: This is not the thread you're looking for. You can goabout your business. Move along, move along.]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:54:41 -0700
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:32:00 -0000, Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org>
wrote:
>ggr@qualcomm.com (Gregory G Rose) wrote in news:bfpki0$kt4@qualcomm.com:
>
>> In article <3F204F7C.75A3177A@t-online.de>,
>> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>This just shows your cowardity.
>>
>> That's "cowardiceness".
>>
>
>Or my favorite: "cowardiciosity."
>
Which is more fancy than the pedestrian: "cowardacity"
- Next message: Peter Gutmann: "Re: why persist PKCS#7 CRL in embedded file sigs?"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: ActiveX Encryption"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: [OT: This is not the thread you're looking for. You can goabout your business. Move along, move along.]"
- Next in thread: John E. Hadstate: "Re: [OT: This is not the thread you're looking for. You can goabout your business. Move along, move along.]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading
