[OT: This is not the thread you're looking for. You can go about your business. Move along, move along.]

From: Simon G Best (s.g.best_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 07/22/03 

Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:20:00 +0000 (UTC)

Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>
> Simon G Best wrote:
>
>>You seem to just be ignoring what's been previously said.
>
> Said by me or you? I hope you would be more precise
> and concrete (in detail) in future.

Here's an example:

> On the other hand,
> in the present case, I do consider it to be a clear
> undesirable waste, if one achieves an average load of
> e.g. only 4% of the full capacity.

(Yet again, among other issues,) "full capacity" in what sense?

And here's another example:

> In this case I do think it is bad. That's why I
> repeatedly said that one could use a better mix of jobs
> to enhance the average performance.

And now some more confusion:

> But I don't see
> how this opinion could constitute a self-contradiction
> as you claimed.

I didn't claim the self-contradiction you claim I claimed.

> M. K. Shen
> ----------------------------------
> P.S. I'll keep on removing certain brackets that you
> introduce in the subject line (so that a presumably
> intended effect of that wouldn't materialize). If you
> meant by that that the post is destined for me
> personally (which I doubt), then use my e-mail address,
> please.

It was not to introduce an effect, but to flag a phenomenon.

Simon

Loading