Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 07/19/03
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Encrypt algorithm to decryption"
- Previous message: Benjamin Goldberg: "Re: Xbox hacks"
- In reply to: Kent Briggs: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- Next in thread: clem: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- Reply: clem: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
"Kent Briggs" <kbriggs@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:ap%Qa.62851$XV.4372963@twister.austin.rr.com...
> Tom St Denis wrote:
>
> > Actually not really. Not only is AES based on Square [a super old
> > design] but Rijndael itself is over two years old. Its a good cipher
> > but not bleeding edge.
>
> What cipher is bleeding edge to you and why do you keep recommending
> AES to others here?
>
1. AES works.
2. AES is the US Government standard for civilian encryption.
(The UK military use it to encrypt disks on laptops.)
Andrew Swallow
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Encrypt algorithm to decryption"
- Previous message: Benjamin Goldberg: "Re: Xbox hacks"
- In reply to: Kent Briggs: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- Next in thread: clem: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- Reply: clem: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]