Re: Surviving Einstein.

From: AE (hidden_at_nospam.com)
Date: 07/17/03 

Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:58:36 +0200

Stonelock wrote:
> AE <hidden@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<3F144942.10805@nospam.com>...
>>...
>>while it is a very interesting model, claiming a single atom could
>>solve the global energy-problem since it's producing an infinite amount
>>of energy :-/
>
> I never claimed such a thing; you did. And infinity is semantic noise
> to patch up semantic gaps. Indefinite is more appropriate. There is no
> such thing as an 'infinite' entity of any kind. Only processes can be
> described as being indefinite.
> ...

What you were claiming was that an electron being described as a
particle could
reach a stable orbit due to the energy produced by coulomb interaction.

This way you are claiming that coulomb interaction would produce energy
while
allowing the distance between the interacting particles would stay
constant or
at least in a constant range.

This is opposed to the model described by "coulomb interaction" and - to
use the
currently used model - "electromagnetic interaction" so you are telling
that as
well Coulomb as Maxwell were wrong.

As a side-effect you are claiming that energy could be produced - which
is opposed
to modern thermodynamics so you are claiming Boltzmann was wrong and
many others.

No need to go further in detail why your claims are opposed to the ones of
Schrödinger and Einstein since you already claimed they were wrong.

Since your electron would constantly produce energy by interacting with
other matter
and replacing the missing energy by producing new one it produces an
infinite amount
of energy - "infinite" meaning that there is no upper bound for the
amount of energy
being produced.

Since there's no upper bound we get as much energy as we want out of it
and voila:
We've solved our energy-problem.

AE

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cosmological Constant Problem real or imagined?
    ... It's virtual-electron-positron can have any mass ... There is an infinite ways for them to interact. ... Since mass is energy. ... QFT is showing us can be put by the following analogy. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Voids in the ground state are negative Mass/Energy/Pressue.
    ... The net energy of the cosmos is negative, ... and its entropy always goes up because its temperature always goes down. ... it'd take infinite acceleration ... the radiation pressure is infinitely dissipated; ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
    ... W is energy transformation ... means finite mass still. ... I am still wishing for this supposed infinite ... Actually I learned classical physics better than the relativistic ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
    ... It seems like more mass, because velocities don't sum up linear. ... It is more energy. ... to make infinite mass and of course the same for the reverse. ... even though it is actually not unitless. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Universe = Mind
    ... >>our entire Universe concentrated to one single dot of light. ... >Consequently, there must be some sort of minimal energy fluctuations, ... We speak about "isles of matter and energy", ... sion of my model with infinite higher dimensions.) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)