Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring
From: Francois Grieu (fgrieu_at_micronet.fr)
Date: 07/16/03
- Previous message: Kent Briggs: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- In reply to: Jim Steuert: "Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring"
- Next in thread: Jim Steuert: "Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring"
- Reply: Jim Steuert: "Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:17:45 +0200
In article <oprschp4a5dwdye5@news.rcn.com>,
Jim Steuert <pjsteuert@rcn.com> wrote:
> As to the original commute.c, and the alleged break.
> I just tried the original commute.c with (..)
> #define NUMPRIMES 16
> #define NUMTERMS 65536
>
> It works fine, but is slow (a minute). But still usable
> in an off-line form.
> And breaks would still take 2^48 work.
This work factor is a proven MAXIMUM, for a MF variant
that requires 2^32 work for the legitimate user. Not only
is that unspectacularly hard, but the work required for
straight Gaussian elimination tells us nothing of the work
for a break by better means. Again, Gaussian elimination is
NOT the best known method to solve a system of linear
equations.
[And the problem required to break MF may be even weaker
than a system of linear equations: knowing
pa=ka#c, pb=kb#c, and c, we want ka#kb#c, which conceivably
could be found without explicitly finding one solution to
the linear system x#c = pa]
> I don't think that even the original commute.c can be
> considered broken.
This version was proven breakable in about 2^36
operations. This does qualify as a total break.
At least another thing proven in
<fgrieu-FE4B71.08313011072003@news.fu-berlin.de>
is that multiple layers reduce to one, with a
REDUCED keyspace, thus LESS security than a single
layer version. This observation applies to tabular.c
as well.
May I strongly suggest to drop multiple layers entirely?
François Grieu
- Previous message: Kent Briggs: "Re: CryptaFlix beta testers needed"
- In reply to: Jim Steuert: "Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring"
- Next in thread: Jim Steuert: "Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring"
- Reply: Jim Steuert: "Re: Magic Flight: A New Public Key Algorithm stronger? than factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|