Re: A basic cryptanalysis question
From: Mark Wooding (mdw_at_nsict.org)
Date: 07/13/03
- Next message: Mark Wooding: "Re: Encryption mode without IV"
- Previous message: Ezhiha: "Re: WANTED: trapdoor one-way function"
- In reply to: DSCOTT: "Re: A basic cryptanalysis question"
- Next in thread: DSCOTT: "Re: A basic cryptanalysis question"
- Reply: DSCOTT: "Re: A basic cryptanalysis question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 13 Jul 2003 13:17:47 GMT
DSCOTT <daVvid_a_scott@email.com> wrote:
> mdw@nsict.org (Mark Wooding) wrote in <slrnbh13vm.18j.mdw@tux.nsict.org>:
>
> >I thought you were trying to show an example where the composition
> >exhibited a weakness that the individual components didn't suffer from.
>
> Then you thought wrong. The example was only to show that
> having to crypto systems in series can be weaker than using
> the strongest of the two by itself.
Huh? But that's what I said.
-- [mdw]
- Next message: Mark Wooding: "Re: Encryption mode without IV"
- Previous message: Ezhiha: "Re: WANTED: trapdoor one-way function"
- In reply to: DSCOTT: "Re: A basic cryptanalysis question"
- Next in thread: DSCOTT: "Re: A basic cryptanalysis question"
- Reply: DSCOTT: "Re: A basic cryptanalysis question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]