Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 07/05/03
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: Khan & Enigma"
- Previous message: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- Next in thread: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- Reply: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 19:16:25 +0200
Brian Gladman wrote:
>
> ScottD wrote:
[snip]
> > 2) The statistical treatment of results is impressive, but making a few
> runs
> > and keeping the best result gives the most accurate and repeatable
> numbers.
>
> Are you saying that the timing results vary widely from one run to the next
> on your system(s)? If so this needs looking at.
[snip]
One point that I earlier remarked about Devine's first
benchmark was that the number of iterations was too
small. If the total running time is only of the order
of, say, 1 sec, I could hardly conceive that one could
obtain so many significant figures in the results as
a superficial look at the results (of the first
benchmark) would suggest. Because of the potential
inaccuracies problem, not only numerical but also due
to the varying operating conditions of the benchmark
run (I don't think that's absolutely constant even
without concurrent user applications), I use to employ
a very large number of iterations in my timing
measurement (it is based on the function clock, I
don't know how good it is), e.g. 10^9, in order to
even out the fluctuations of the results as far as
possible.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: Khan & Enigma"
- Previous message: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- Next in thread: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- Reply: Brian Gladman: "Re: More performance tests of different AES implementations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|